Forum:Serious issues/need admin?

A certain fan has been editing the article about the Nightborne to the extent that the entire page is completely unusable. The discussion page cannot seem to keep up.

An example here: http://wow.gamepedia.com/Nightborne#Nightborne.27s_night_elveness An entire subsection filled with rambling about the Nightborne's "night elveness"

It is to be noted that this is not under "Speculation" but presented as fact. The edits are could be considered vandalism if the editor was not simply an overly-enthusiastic fan and but they certainly not in the spirit of the site, IMO. --Felicitas66 (talk) 14:35, 26 September 2016 (UTC)


 * I admit it looks a bit messy, but considering my highest level character is only 104 (tfw) I won't touch that page because I don't know much about nightborne themselves. Sorry Xporc (talk) 15:02, 26 September 2016 (UTC)


 * I commented it out for now. That page is indicative of a wider problem. On some parts of the wiki, we lack the editor-base required to have contributions that are both active and good at the same time. I'm playing Legion, so I'll fill it out unless I forget.-- 17:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC)


 * If reference is needed, there's this stickied Wowhead comment on their page for Good Suramaritan that details the related quests and has videos for most of them. I've also done all the nightborne quests up to The Emerald Nightmare: The Stuff of Dreams (waiting for LFR Xavius to unlock), so I can also look through my chat log if you think the dialogue in the videos don't match with live. -- Alayea (talk / contrib) 21:08, 6 October 2016 (UTC)