Talk:Violet Hold (lore)

Nice page. Xporc (talk) 13:48, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Move
I agree this page should move to violet hold while the dungeons should be named after the expansions they were added. as example "Violet Hold (Legion)" (Yuvalal (talk) 08:54, 14 May 2020 (UTC))
 * I wouldn't mind seeing this page moved to just "Violet Hold", with the WotLK dungeon at "Violet Hold (instance)" and the Legion dungeon staying at "Assault on Violet Hold" as it's name already differs. PeterWind (talk) 09:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Agreed with PW. --Ryon21 (talk) 11:13, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * But anyway it need to be move . I dont mind how the other one will be named in which way but i think this page should not be named with " (lore)".(Yuvalal (talk) 13:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC))
 * lots of links to update tho :/ Xporc (talk) 08:07, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Cant it be done with bot ?(Yuvalal (talk) 11:55, 15 May 2020 (UTC))
 * No, those would require human intelligence Xporc (talk) 12:49, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If we are settled on those names, I don't mind going through this list. PeterWind (talk) 13:09, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The "Violet Hold (lore)" can be moved with a bot without problems once all the other pages are OK. It is the "Violet Hold" links that should be manually checked. I think I was the one who started to move all these links but I eventually left it hanging. Well, at least it is not a Quel'Thalas and Gilneas scope. I truly have no idea how I managed to check such quantity of links back then. :monkas: --Ryon21 (talk) 13:14, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * A bot can be used to speed up the process, like processing every pages in the "Violet Hold items", "Violet Hold mobs" and "Violet Hold NPCs" categories but the rest will have to be done by hand Xporc (talk) 13:44, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Why it has to be so hard :pepehands: (Yuvalal (talk) 12:47, 16 May 2020 (UTC))