Talk:Undisplayed location

In the zone
I think it would be better if this page focused on subzones not displayed in the zones and just that. Adding instanced locations like battlegrounds and arenas while they are nowhere to be found in the zone might be confusing. So if those are added in the Lore locations part of the subregions section (not necessary to put them in the Lore location page) would make more sense because, even though they are in-game, they are not in the zone. Also add this page's category to all those undisplayed subzones whether they have some lore on not. Basically a page about this in-game thing and not the lore. --Ryon21 (talk) 17:28, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I think it's fitting as it is because when you look at the template, you have the subzones of a zone, the locations that are technically part of the zone but that do not show up in-game (undisplayed locations, i.e the Temple of Kotmogu is inside the Vale of Blossoms, but when you go to the Vale you can't see it, it's an undisplayed location), and locations that technically exist but do not exist in-game at all (lore locations).
 * If we moved instanced locations like the Temple of Kotmogu to Lore locations, that would challenge the definition of a Lore location. Meanwhile, both types of undisplayed locations (instanced and non-instanced) do fit inside of, well, "Undisplayed location".-- MyMindWontQuiet 18:11, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't we use the template for things that are in the zone? Yeah, we could change the definition because, in a sense they are still lorewise located in zones but in-game is not shown. Basically lore locations should be places that are said to be in a zone, but they aren't currently there. Inside this we would have locations shown in books, comics etc. and locations that even though they are in-game, they aren't in the zone. I'm hesitant mainly because I would like to keep separated the places inside the zone and the ones that are not there in the overworld. --Ryon21 (talk) 19:26, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Of course, another possibility is keeping things like they are now, but in the zone template only have the ones in the overworld, and in the subregions section also add those instanced. And in this page separate Overworld locations and Instanced locations. --Ryon21 (talk) 19:35, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
 * This would really be better as a category.-- 00:22, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't see an issue with this being just a category. 18:45, 9 September 2018 (UTC)