Talk:The Wardens

Is this "the" at the beginning okay? Coz there is this Warden page which refers to "class" rather than the new Maiev's faction in Legion, so would it be okay to have Wardens (without the) page for faction? --Mordecay (talk) 19:31, 7 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The verbatim reputation faction is fine.-- 21:16, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Lore
What you described is the Watchers and wardens, Nico di angelos. This one should contain only Legion info of the group. --Mordecay (talk) 13:08, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Tried my best to narrow the lore info to focus on the wardens, but the two groups are just too intertwined. Though I think you're right, a lot of the information is irrelevant, I think the formation section should at least stay, but I'm not opposed to the WC3 and the wolfheart sections being removed. Nico di angelos (talk) 13:22, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Edit: I just did that, and I added a main article redirect, I'll be adding some more info in the legion section that directly pertains to the faction's story in the game. Nico di angelos (talk) 13:28, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Linking
The inconsistency is about wardens who are tagged with The Wardens faction as well so having the link here doesn't really hurt. --Mordecay (talk) 15:05, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Faction Tag
Should this be updated next week to be 'alliance' lorewise? Or would it be left alone/separated because it's also an ingame faction?--Berenal (talk) 17:17, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Since it's specifically about the rep faction, I'd leave it. Lore stuff is on the Wardens page. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 18:01, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * DTZ speaks the truth. Xporc (talk) 18:55, 5 December 2018 (UTC)