Talk:Timeline (from official site, 2007)

It probably should be noted that there are issues with this timeline (like most of them I suppose). This one poorly tacks on dates without actually taking dates mentioned in The Burning Crusade into account for example.Baggins 13:20, 9 January 2008 (EST)

Cataclysm
Year when Cataclysm happens was never mentioned on official site. I'd rather not adding in in "timeline from official site" page despite forum posters' speculations.PrinceOfHohland 11:29, 13 Marth 2008 (EST)


 * Since Kosak confirmed that Cataclysm takes place in year 28, should we update this timeline? It's official info, after all.--Cemotucu (talk) 01:59, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Until a source specifically says "it takes place in year 28" rather than implying it, we should leave that to the unofficial timeline, in my opinion. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 02:06, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * While I think that Kosak pretty much confirmed that Cataclysm started in year 28 (and I would update this official timeline), I understand your position. May we procede like it was done in the Unofficial Timeline, with a footnote?--Cemotucu (talk) 02:13, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * This version of the timeline is primarily here to serve as a source, as the original is no longer online, so we probably shouldn't start adding things to it that weren't there to begin with. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 02:19, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I think in that case it should have the appropriate tag--Ashbear160 (talk) 02:48, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Yet, shouldn't Kosak info be wikified, as it could serve as a source for other articles?--Cemotucu (talk) 02:59, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes but not on this article. This is a source article, a copy-paste of a official wow page that has been deleted. It's intended to act as a replacement source rather than a normal wiki article.--Ashbear160 (talk) 03:02, 2 January 2013 (UTC)