Talk:Title

Realm 1st Achievement Titles
Since the 'Realm 1st achievement titles are not going to be in the game release - shouldn't they be removed from this page? Or, do you expect them to be given out in another set of achievement at a later time ? - ( Morph | Contribs | Talk ) 15:56, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Realm 1st Boss Kills titles are not being removed - ( Morph | Contribs | Talk ) 19:34, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

I would think it would be good to include them for historical purposes. I enjoy looking at the development of the game, but that's just me.--Azbulldog (talk) 04:21, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Code
Why are the achievements on the Achievement Titles chart marked as code when they are not? Is that bad?-- 19:36, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The   make the background darker and changes the font so that you can see it better - that is all it does  -- ( Morph  | Contribs | Talk ) 20:11, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Feat of Strength Titles
Just curious, but wouldn't Bloodsail Admiral be more appropriate in this catagory then in the PvE Title section? --Dregtal Talk
 * Feats of Strength Titles was not intended to have any titles listed under it (since Feats of Strengths are Achievements). That section is there to tell bring your attention to the fact that the Feats of Strength Title's that were, on the PTR, awarded for being the Realm First! Level 80 Gnome, Realm First! Level 80 Mage, etc... were removed from the game at the release of Wrath of the Lich King. Bloodsail Admiral is not in the PVE section it is in the Achievement section. -- 04:46, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, my mistake. Thank you for the correction. Also, it was a good description of what constituted a Feat of Strength Title. --Dregtal Talk
 * Now I'm confused. Why aren't there any titles listed in that section? I thought there still were some. 12:23 AM, 17 Aug 2009 (EDT)
 * If you go the the Article and loot at the TOC you will see:

Contents[hide]

* 1 Currently obtainable titles o 1.1 PvE titles o 1.2 Achievement titles o 1.3 Feat of Strength titles o 1.4 PvP titles * 2 Unobtainable titles
 * Section 1.3 has never had any titles listed in it. It has always been a note letting you know about the beta Realm First! titles that were in beta not being in the final release of . All titles from achievements that are obtainable are in section 1.2 (always have been). -- 04:40, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and organized all these topics that seem more like "notes" IMO. 1:24 AM, 17 Aug 2009 (EDT)

Herald of the Titans can still be obtained. The article states it is unobtainable but this is not true. The title is just very difficult to get now. Royalite from Aggramar got the achievement after 4.0. You can check the dates. Even http://www.wowpedia.org/Herald_of_the_Titans doesn't have the new wording of the achievement. It requires the gear but also lvl 80. It is possible to get the title but very hard to get a geared group of 80s for the title. I am not an experienced wiki user but it would be more accurate to list the title as obtainable. --Royalite (talk) 03:35, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Standard
Seems we need a standard here... some titles redirect to this article, some use the achievement page, and others have their own tiny article (even if they have a related achievement). 02:32, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Level requirements, etc
Some titles go across all your characters, some do not, it seems. I'm not sure on the mechanics. For instance, I only killed the Lich King on my 90 priest, but my Warrior was still able to use The Kingslayer". My lower-level toons could not use the title.--Pittsburghmuggle (talk) 13:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, Blizz has made all title account bound, however, they must be at levels that one would normally achieve them in order to alts to gain them as well. 00:23, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Cleanup, streamlining and criteria
At this point the page is starting to look a bit messy, if I'm honest - specifically in regards to criteria. Someplaces it just lists the required achievement(s); in other it's explained in much more detail. Maybe we should decide on one or the other? Either keep it to achievements only, or expand the explanation where only the achievement is currently listed? (And in the latter case, make sure it's not written in a variety of different ways which only serves to make it look all the more messy). - Dajax02 (talk) 12:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
 * i’d say listing the achievements only should be fine. if someone wants the details they can just go to the achievement’s page —Eithris (talk) 14:54, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Agreed. -- 11:02, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah in cases where the titles are simply tied to an achievement it should be fine just listing the achievements. PeterWind (talk) 15:59, 9 November 2019 (UTC)