Forum:Broken Isle quest levels

Since the majority of quests scale to the players level its probably not right to mark each quest as a level 100 quest with a level 98 required.

I'm thinking we should either mark the quest as its required level or make it 100 - 110.

| level = 98 | levelreq = 98
 * Option A

| level = 100 - 110 | levelreq = 98
 * Option B

Since this is something that will likely be a common theme going forward in future expansions, we should probably decide how to handle them. Opinions or suggestions? 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure which I prefer, but yeah we should probably decide which to stick with, as soon as possible. I'm not really opposed to either. PeterWind (talk) 00:43, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I like option B. --Dark T Zeratul (talk) 03:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I wasn't sure what to go with myself either, which is why the quests I worked on were flagged as 100 with a 98 req. I think option B would work best, though it should read as 98-110 and not 100-110. -- Alayea (talk / contrib) 22:07, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Do the quests scale at 98 and 99, or does the scaling actually start at 100? I've only entered the Broken Isles at 100. 14:13, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Good point. I don't have any sub-100 characters that are even close to level 98, unfortunately. -- Alayea (talk / contrib) 02:54, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * You get the Broken Shore quest at 98, so it should. I have a level 98 shaman I can try to verify it on. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 18:17, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Now that we seem to be a little bit more active lately (fresh blood and all) do we have any other opinions or suggestions for this. The new expansion is likely around the corner and will have the same scaling level quest issue. 19:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)


 * For what it's worth, I'm still a proponent of Option B. -- 19:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Option B seems OK to me. Xporc (talk) 22:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I also still favor Option B. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 00:05, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Fine by me. PeterWind (talk) 00:52, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Ok, I believe I got all of them. 21:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Sweet! :) PeterWind (talk) 23:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)