Wowpedia talk:New Enhanced Writing Style

Votes

 * Yes :


 * No :

Comments
Withdrawn. It has come to my attention that this proposal currently lacks infobox, or even a navbox to easily navigate between similar policies; fails to use nearly enough images and internal links to exciting articles, and does not cite its wild assertions of Wowpedia's superiority to all other WoW information sources. However, its non-compliance with the content and writing style guidelines is even more egregious: the article contains only one proper use of "however," making this policy proposal decidedly. This might take a dozen months or so to rewrite to conform to those policy, at which point we might just have to put it up for a vote again. — foxlit (talk) 06:12, 2 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm also deeply saddened by my apparent inability to find some sort of a "policy withdrawn" tag to put on the article/vote. I've settled for marking everything with |doc= to suppress categorization, but if anyone has a better solution... — foxlit (talk) 06:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I might be able to design one, however, I do not have the time at the moment, however, I could find the time, however, it seems it would likely only be used here so I don't imagine I would create such a tag, however, I am saddened that you did not think ahead about adding an infobox to said policy changes, however, I am excited for the future changes that could take place soon... however, oh a squirrel... 20:36, 2 April 2013 (UTC)