User talk:DevilDude14253

Introductions by Ragestorm
I'm Ragestorm, one of the WoWWiki Bookkeepers. We watch the pages classified as "lore" for changes and erroneous material. As the Bookkeeper who monitors the Night Elves and the Naga, I notice you change to the "related species" section about the "fire naga." While I'm not contesting the material you posted, I'd like to know if the elemental explaination is speculation, of if it's backed up by some sort of text. If it is speculation, that's perfectly fine, but a note must be added saying that it's speculation. ("It's likely that..." or "The lost likely relationship is...", ect.) If there is text to back it up, that should be cited. I apoligize if I sound like I'm nagging or harassing, but it's part of my job (and I think the analysis is a correct one). Happy Feast of Winter Veil/Holidays-Ragestorm, Head Bookkeeper Dec. 19th, 2005 18:19 (EST)

Silver's Messages
Just got three messages from your friendly community team leader SilverSide:

Welcome
Welcome to WoWWiki! Hope you can help the community and vice versa (-:

If you have any questions, I would be happy to answer them, or you could drop them at the reference desk (where I might answer them anyway)! ... Just wanted to say welcome, and to encourage you to contribute! &#8465;ilver&#167;&#8465;ide|undefined

Want to help? Join a team!
As a community it is easier to get large amounts of maintenance and community projects done in teams - we like to recruit each new Wikiuser to join one or two. Check out Community teams for more info! &#8465;ilver&#167;&#8465;ide|undefined

Forums
For community discussions about policy, team work and projects, and other WoWWiki stuff, see the unofficial Forums! Make sure to register ASAP! &#8465;ilver&#167;&#8465;ide|undefined