Talk:Sorceress

Who suggested this to be merged? 22:15, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * this edit PeterWind (talk) 06:51, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks Peter. @Mordecay, what is your reasoning for merging the page other than it being the exact same thing but the female counter part? 07:50, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Do we have any other example of separating a class page based on sex? Xporc (talk) 08:01, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't make sense to have females on a page called Sorcerer. And Blizzard is inconsistent on this, calling females Sorcerers Lel. 08:07, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Considering we have a single page for priest and priestesses, as well as a single page for hunter and huntresses (I mean, the ones that are not night elven riders), I wouldn't be shocked to see a Sorcerer page talking about both sorcerers and sorceresses. Xporc (talk) 12:25, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Just seems sexist IMO. 03:42, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't see any reason to keep the pages separate either. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 06:52, 17 May 2018 (UTC)


 * My reasoning is that there seems to be no difference, sorcerers and sorceresses are the same thing - mages, and yeah, haven't seen much differentiating between sexes. When there was, tho, it got merged. --Mordecay (talk) 01:05, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Should this merge be voted on? I'm for merging the page to Sorcerer. There is also the Huntress page but that can be argued to be more specific as a type of Sentinel rather then the female of the Hunter class. Mrforesttroll (talk) 00:41, 4 June 2021 (UTC)