Talk:Lord Jaraxxus

Jaraxxus has no lore to speak of and only an extremely minor appearance outside the fight. There is no reason to split off a tactics page until that changes. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 20:18, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * It seemed a good idea ._. But I'm sure he'll get more lore on Argus. Xporc (talk) 20:26, 12 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Well, Jaraxxus is getting lore on Argus so I agree with Xporc that it seems to be a good idea. And when I tagged Brutallus for splitting I had two things in mind: the recent Jaraxxus split (tho, it doesn't look like he is getting anything in Argus as of yet). And a revert from you where u reasoned that his page is specifically about the Sunwell encounter. So besides the encounter he appeared twice (Broken Shore scenario and the pre-Legionfall Broken Shore zone version (+non-instanced Sunwell appearance?)). So it, too, seemed a good idea to make a separate "lore" page. --Mordecay (talk) 20:36, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah, I didn't realize he already had appearances on Argus. The only thing on the page was his brief appearance at the end of the Broken Shore scenario. In that case, yeah, this should be split. I do, however, think the original talk page should go with the encounter page since all the comments were from a time when his encounter was all there was and thus all directly relate to it. I'll swap these.
 * Regarding Brutallus, there's still no reason for a separate lore page because he has no lore or appearances outside his two encounters. That's a discussion better suited for his talk page than here, though. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 21:21, 12 July 2017 (UTC)