User talk:Kershner30661

Welcome
Welcome to WoWWiki! Hope you can help the community and vice versa (-:

If you have any questions, I would be happy to answer them, or you could drop them at the reference desk (where I might answer them anyway)!

Just wanted to say welcome, and to encourage you to contribute!
 * &#8465;ilver&#167;&#8465;ide|undefined

Want to help? Join a team!
Also, if you are here to help the community as a whole (and not just edit an article or two that you noticed needed changing), then I suggest you check out the various community teams - we could always use some help! Find one that suits you and leave a message on it's join page!
 * &#8465;ilver&#167;&#8465;ide|undefined

Warlock Lore
Warlock lore should be in Warlock lore not both locations. Otherwise one is more cluttered. If someone removed lore from Warlock lore then something is wrong.Baggins 02:41, 8 January 2007 (EST)
 * I absolutely agree, but in this case the content was not in both locations, the content was only in the Warlock page. I was thus given three options, revert, returning the content to the Warlock page where it is acceptable but not preferable; leave the content deleted; or move the content to the lore page.  Given the current state of the lore page, that option was deemed inappropriate.  If you wish to clean up the lore page and move the content there (with a link placed on the primary Warlock page so that people can find it), that would be an acceptable remedy.  Kershner 02:45, 8 January 2007 (EST)

The last option you overlooked was clean up the Warlock page, move the other content over to warlock lore and then stub it with a clean up template. At least one of the pages can be clean instead of having orphan information cluttering the other.Baggins 02:54, 8 January 2007 (EST)
 * Actually, what you describe above is exactly what I would advocate and is the third option I listed above. Time considerations prevent me from a proper cleanup.  Thus cleanup >> clutter >> deletion, but where cleanup is not a viable option (per time), clutter is the next best.  Kershner 02:58, 8 January 2007 (EST)