Talk:Deathstalkers

Is it "Deatshstalker" or "Deathstalkers"? Rolandius ( talk  -  contr ) 10:57, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Deathstalkers is a faction and Deathstalker is a class. SPLIT/Create other article??? There is no guarantee that all Deathstalker is in the Undercity DeathstalkeS faction (Anyway the faction and the class are two different topics; if there is a need for new article, this is more than sufficient motivation to create one).Gabrirt (talk) 19:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * What citeable information is there on this class?-- 20:18, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Well they are a kind of Rogue: Forsaken Rogues more specifically. And I didn't search for other informations but the second paragraph is about the class and the first is about the faction.Gabrirt (talk) 20:26, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * You think that an uncited paragraph needs its own page...-- 20:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I might support a class page. But all deathstalkers are most certainly a part of the deathstalkers. It's very redundant. [[Image:inv_helmet_44.png|22px]]  (talk contribs) 20:35, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * This seems a little like arguing that "Scarlet Crusader" is its own class and should be split from the "Scarlet Crusade" page. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 21:00, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Which is a stupid argument in itself, i vote for no split. At least you can say that deathstalkers are just a elite type of rouge but not a separate class in itself.--Ashbear160 (talk) 21:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Scarlet crusader is a page. Still, no. That one at least has RPG lore documenting what one is.-- 21:07, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Move
Faction is called Deathstalkers. Other similar cases where a member has singular redirect to faction page that has plural in name like Sunwalker redirects to Sunwalkers, and blood knight to Blood Knights, etc. Mordecay (talk) 19:31, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
 * No objections. Xporc (talk) 15:06, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * So, please, do! :-D --Mordecay (talk) 19:34, 3 June 2019 (UTC)