Forum:Infobox icons

I'd actually like to get a feel on everyone's opinion on all these faction icons getting added to the zone infoboxes. I was fine with these 3 getting added in neutral zone settlement sections, but I find it very redundant to see them next to capitals, rulers, and towns that belong to the same faction as the whole zone. To pull an example Eversong Woods is a Horde zone; do we really need to mark each location with a Horde icon? Deepholm is a neutral zone with all locations in the infobox marked neutral.

I also don't like the combat one being used at all. Should just be or nothing.

I personally don't like them used on every line like they are, but I'm curious to hear everyone's thoughts about it. 04:11, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree, especially with regards to the combat icon. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 04:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Agreed. I think the faction icons should only be used if there are two or more rival factions in the zone, not if the entire zone is Alliance/Horde/neutral. -- 10:14, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Agreed. Also "rulers". Notable characters in the zone doesn't mean they rule it. --Mordecay (talk) 10:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Agreed. PeterWind (talk) 11:08, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * And while we're at it, a settlement has to actually be a place people are settled, not just a place NPCs happen to be giving quests. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 17:51, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Agreed. A place where people actually live and not just a temporary location with tents and the like. 19:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC)