Talk:Silithid Royalty

Preventing Princess from healing
This is how my guild keeps Princess from healing, and it might be suggest that this be added to the page.

We setup a mage rotation of 3-4 mages. We use BigWigs to monitor when she heals (or look at it visually) and a member of the raid calls out over Vent/TS the next mage in the rotation. When she tries to heal, a mage casts Counterspell on Princess to stop the heal, then the mage leader calls out the next person to monitor Princess. This strategy basically prevents her from healing if executed correctly. Since the mages are not in melee of Princess, they cannot be feared and can cast the Counterspell even during a fear.

Just something to think about. --Cigawoot 14:17, 22 September 2006 (EDT)

Bad wording
There's a comment along the lines of "Since the last patch.." that I highly doubt means 3.0.2 at this point in time. I'd change it to a patch version myself, but I don't know which patch brought that change, so can someone take care of it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by.

Split?
It's been suggested this page be split to have 3 lore pages, one for each bug.

There's nothing to split, if you wish to make what is currently redirects to this article go ahead. I'm going to remove the split request soonish. 01:54, December 25, 2009 (UTC)


 * To be fair, every single other multi-boss fight has articles for each boss involved, even when there's little reason to do so (see Twin Val'kyr, Twin Emperors, Eredar Twins, etc.) -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 02:03, December 25, 2009 (UTC)


 * Aye, but nothing from this article can be split into other pages... minus the name of the mob. 02:33, December 25, 2009 (UTC)


 * Again, look at the Twin Val'kyr. They each have individual pages, both of which contain absolutely nothing besides a one-sentence description, an infobox, and a link to the fight page. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 21:26, December 25, 2009 (UTC)


 * Please understand what I'm saying... if someone wants to create the pages (even if one line and a link to the fight) that's fine. What I'm saying is there's nothing to split from the this article and it was not correct to place a split stub here. 00:12, December 26, 2009 (UTC)
 * Aaaaaaaah. I did misunderstand what you were saying. Sorry 'bout that. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 00:36, December 26, 2009 (UTC)

Move to Silithid Royalty?
The raidinfo UI calls this encounter Silithid Royalty. Since I think this is the first official name we've gotten for the encounter (and it sounds worlds better than "Three Bugs"), should we move it there? -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 21:05, 21 March 2011 (UTC)


 * If that's the case, then I don't have any objections to move it. -- 21:07, 21 March 2011 (UTC)


 * ...Looks like Kirkburn sysop protected four years ago and never lifted it, so I can't move it myself. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 21:08, 21 March 2011 (UTC)


 * By the way, can we confirm with the RaidUI bosses with speculative name? ACidmaw, the Val'kyr, the blood princes, and other?
 * 21:12, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the long delay, but here we go: Northrend Beasts, Val'kyr Twins, and Blood Council. Any others you're curious about? -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 19:39, 11 October 2011 (UTC)