Talk:Alamo

Starting
May someone please start this article?-Bubblehearthlol


 * Er, no? -- Kirkburn 19:37, 15 August 2006 (EDT)

Why? Give it a chance. Or, let this one be deleted so an actual Alamo article can be made.-Bubblehearthlol


 * And what exactly is the point of this article? -- Kirkburn 07:09, 16 August 2006 (EDT)

To inform people of the Druid equivalent of Kralnor-Bubblehearthlol


 * I'd like to say, the druid page did get vandalized with this one time. I thought it was funny. Then I reverted it for the umpteenth time. Pzychotix 15:40, 19 August 2006 (EDT)

WHICH Thunderhorn Server?
European or American? --Efreeti 02:22, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Go look at his armory profile in the External links section at the bottom of the page. -- k _d3 02:26, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Useless..
Sorry Folks.. being 1) 2 months using WoW and 2) trying to make a new druid, this article is painful to read, and IMHO useless. There are much better articles, describing the same info, that is much less painful to read..

I dont know about Alamo's other articles, but this one certainly leave a lot to be desired, for me.

Sorry, but thats the way I see it.

Peace.. Lynlee
 * It's a joke. 19:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

OH NOES
dead external picture links. Parl2001 (talk) 16:20, January 6, 2010 (UTC)

Now With Local Images
Changes:
 * Changed to use local images embedded.
 * Images formatted as frameless, 800px max, no link to match WoWWiki.
 * Cleaned up some of the section lines.
 * Converted all the links to use the template.
 * Used the tag and for the links that correspond to headings.

Wikify?
Why is this article marked as ? It is more or less a mirror of the contents of those posts; so, it doesn't make much sense to do internal links within the post mirrors. I've fixed the references and cleaned up the image stuff. Can we remove the tag?

Pelf (talk) 12:19, 17 September 2011 (UTC)


 * We will just thumb the pictures to give clarity to the whole thing
 * 07:12, 19 September 2011 (UTC)


 * That's fair. I had hesitations even at 800px. Maybe we can compromise at 400px? :)
 * Pelf (talk) 04:49, 24 September 2011 (UTC)