Category talk:Lore characters

Are they really a part of the Lore?
I was browsing through the category, and i stumbled upon several characters which i'd say are not a part of the warcraft lore. Although they may be names from some multiplayerscenarios in warcraft III i don't think that D'vorjakque and Xaxion Drak'eem are a part of the warcraft lore. That would be like sayin' that Candy War was an actual war and a part of the lore too. So i think they (and it is possible there are others too) should be removed from this category. - Aedror42 (talk) 18:19, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Since multiplayer scenarios are not part of lore, I'd say just the game characters category would do. 20:38, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd suggest we move the RPG characters to a separate section from WoW and RTS characters. Sarm3 (talk) 05:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * We already have Category:RPG characters. 05:42, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Influential or important
How do we define "influential or important"? Several characters appearing in this category were minor characters who often showed up just long enough to die. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 22:32, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The unwritten rule for the "lore ___" categories is that they are all things that do not appear in WoW. Just ask Lon-ami, who "runs" this system of classification. The category advertizes itself as something different, but that is what it is used for. Should it be renamed, or shoved back into its stated purpose?-- 00:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * If that's the case, then the category description should be rewritten. Currently, it specifies that it's for important characters and explicitly includes important characters who also appear in-game. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 01:02, 15 September 2011 (UTC)