User talk:Dragonflame15527

On Armor Sets And Links
Hello Dragon flame I popped in to say hello and thank you for the help with adding more info to the Armor Sets area. I made one very minor change on the Embrace of the Viper set you added. Also I made some update to your links on your user page. If you look at the code I've corrected the link to the Armor set Category and to my user page. There is nothing wrong with the way you were linking to my user page it just made it out to be an external link. I've changed that so it works as a normal internal WoWWiki link. Also when you link to the Category armor set when you want it used as a way to send people to that page all you need to do is put the double square brackets around Armor Sets. Notice the ':' before the word category. If that isn't there it will think the articale you are making is a submision to the Armor Sets Category. Okay I think I've blabbered on enough so let me end this with a link to something I'm finding very helpful as I learn to edit pages here Editing Help on Meta Wikimedia. Thank you again for the help in getting sets added! --BaldMonkey 19:40, 28 Sep 2005 (EDT)

Ohh and P.S. when you make an entry to the Discussion pages add your signature after your entry by either clicking the "signature" button above the text area or by typing in --~


 * Make as many changes as you would like to any of those pages, I dont mind as long as there not stupid ones. I added a new Armor Set a few min ago (Defias Leather). Looks like in my one day here ive done good with friends! --Dragonflame 21:15, 28 Sep 2005 (EDT)


 * Generally, you'd put your response in the same section as what you're responding to, just to make it more readable. But as long as someone can figure it out (by looking at the time of the edit), I'm sure no one else will mind if you're different. :P By the way, I looked at your edits to the quickdraw quiver article. I chuckled when I saw what you did. Have fun editing. Schmidt talk 23:57, 28 Sep 2005 (EDT)


 * Yeah everything you are doing is great. I'm just very nit pickly about some of the odd ball thinks I find so I will likely figget with any additions in an area I'm currently working on.  Normally they will just be small things to try and make sure they mesh with all the other information in that area.  That and I always seems to come up with other ways to change the display information around. In some slight way to hopefully make the stuff more readable and usefull. --BaldMonkey 05:27, 29 Sep 2005 (EDT)


 * Sounds Good, If you notice on my Lightforge page, I slightly changed around the template to add specific armor on each piece, so if you want that, just use the template from the Lightforge page. --Dragonflame 10:15, 29 Sep 2005 (EDT)


 * I was trying to avoid adding to much info about each piece since It is covered in the "totals" area. The other problem is when do you stop adding extra info?  Maybe we can try and work out something for a piece by piece break out.  But then that is covered on Thottbot and Allakhazam. --BaldMonkey 14:37, 29 Sep 2005 (EDT)


 * Maybe we could have a seperate Wowwiki page for each piece of the sets? This would take a lot of work, but overall would add a lot more depth to the sets. Then again, as you said that completely undermines Thottbot/Allahkazham. I also saw your Warrior Sets page and Added my own Hunter Set's page. Im still working on it, but so far its fairly decent. BTW i wont be online from friday afternoon to Sunday night, so i wnot be able to do anything. --Dragonflame 18:31, 29 Sep 2005 (EDT)


 * In all fairness I am not the one that started the site I just happen to play a warrior so that is the page I started mucking around in and later it evolved into what has become a revamp of the "Sets" area of the web page. And I'm not so worried about undermining Thott/Allah as much as I'm not sure how easy it would be to update the item information to keep it acurate.  It could be done and I'm sure I can even work up some nice display if ya want. --BaldMonkey 19:39, 29 Sep 2005 (EDT)


 * Ah, well I took the idea and copied for the Hunter's. I dont understand what would be tough about updating them. Blizzard never changes the item's, just add's new ones. Or is that what you are talking about? I'm horrible with the displays, so if we do that then you need to make the display's, and I'll copy it :) It's up to you whether to do that or not though, remember, I just saw your idea and liked it, but it was YOUR idea. So you get the decisions. --Dragonflame 19:56, 29 Sep 2005 (EDT)

So many corrections
I think by Wowpedia you mean WoWWiki. :-P You might consider previewing changes you make rather than saving each time, and discovering that you don't like what you see. I see that you made a boatload of changes to Bloodhoof Village. Try making more changes at a time. No problem if you simply see a fault that you didn't notice. Schmidt talk 11:15, 27 Sep 2005 (EDT)


 * Thanks for some feedback. I'm pretty new here so most of those changes are tests to see what works/looks good and what doesnt. With that said I will try not to get quite as many new changes, and I'll use the preview tool more. --Dragonflame 18:53, 29 Sep 2005 (EDT)

Item and Set Category Layout
I plant to post this on the Community Portal area as well but wanted to let you know here as well. If you look at my Current Projects area I have set up a template to work as a guide to help bring all item and set info under one area. I will start to set up all the pages once we get some suggestions from more people that use the site. If they have no major changes or suggestions I will lay out some starter items for you and others to copy when adding in new items. --BaldMonkey 21:31, 29 Sep 2005 (EDT)


 * I motivated you, that makes me sound important :). But....Wow......thats going to take a lot of work. What exactly do you mean by template? I'm definetly up for helping you in every way I can! So, did we decide about the seperate pages for each piece of armor? In the meantime, ill get back to my armor set's. --Dragonflame 22:01, 29 Sep 2005 (EDT)


 * By template I'm just saying I will work out some way to display a single item information on the page that can be copied for the other items. And if we follow along with the way I have it layed out yes adding in a single item will be very doable.  At that point the item set can have the item name link back to the item information.  Right now I'm just going around and finding some stray bits of information and giving them a home. I would suggesting waiting a few days before doing to many additions beyond the item sets.  Just to see what others think of the lay out. --BaldMonkey 22:14, 29 Sep 2005 (EDT)


 * Ok, sounds good. Im going on vacation for a few days soon, so it fits in well. Judging by the Recent Changes page, it looks a lot like your killing yourself for this :) --Dragonflame 22:17, 29 Sep 2005 (EDT)

Images - Names
Please use more descriptive names for images you upload.

"Giant1.jpg" for giantstalker gear is not enough imo.


 * OwlBoy 05:32, 30 Sep 2005 (EDT)


 * Ok, sorry about that ill use longer more descriptive ones. --Dragonflame 18:35, 30 Sep 2005 (EDT)

Sets
Hi, I finished the project you kicked off with set consolidation. Category:World of Warcraft armor item sets is now sorted out. -- Hammersmith 06:20, 31 Dec 2005 (EST)