Forum:Warlords of Draenor characters

After watching the ending cinematic for Hellfire Citadel, it makes me wonder if we will be seeing these characters join us in future content. If we do, we may need to think of a different way to name their articles instead of "(Warlords of Draenor)". 06:43, 28 June 2015 (UTC)


 * What about (alternate universe)?--Mordecay (talk) 07:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)


 * That could work, but I suppose we can wait to see what happens for the next expansion. Since with this change all articles using (Warlords of Draenor) will need to change. 04:37, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Well, looks like Gul'dan needs a renaming now. From Gul'dan (Warlords of Draenor) to ? (alternate universe) ? We should probably start a vote cause this might affect more characters that come from Draenor. 19:34, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I like the simplicity of (AU). -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 19:36, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Vote
With characters from Draenor moving into future expansions the tag (Warlords of Draenor) attached to their article name will no longer make sense. To fix this I suggest we change how we handle the naming of current and future "alternate" characters.

The outcome of the vote will likely change all existing characters, not just the ones entering Azeroth.

✅

Change votes

 * Yes, a change is needed :


 * No, keep it as (Warlords of Draenor) :

If yes
If you agree a change is needed, please vote on which one you'd prefer:


 * (alternate) :


 * (alternate universe) :


 * (AU) :

Comments
For the record, I was fine with the (Warlords of Draenor) tag. That said, after today's Gamescom 2015 reveal it is clear that the tag will no longer be sufficient for the wiki's needs. I voted for (alternate universe) because while I'd love to type (AU), I object to the latter for two reasons. I don't really care for (alternate) either because, to me, it sounds and looks incomplete. (I don't want to chance any confusion as to the meaning, as well.) This leads back to my earlier statement regarding informal speech. -- Alayea (talk / contrib) 20:34, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The tag is used mainly in fanfiction circles. While fanfiction has become much more mainstream today compared to when I joined fanfiction.net back in 2002, it's still not penetrated the general populace to the same degree as video gaming.
 * It's informal speech. I'd like the proposed tag to appear more professional than that.


 * A few years ago we had a similar discussion regarding the characters from Thrall:_Twilight_of_the_Aspects. We decided against it because there were not enough alternate characters to justify seperate pages like they did on MemoryAlpha.... Reconsider? --LemonBaby (talk) 10:25, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Yep I agree but instead "alternate universe" use "alternate timeline" because that's what is referred to in War Crimes, Twilight of the Aspects. "AU" could be redirect. Oh and I'd like to if TotA's alternate characters could be reconsidered because Aedelas's infobox is a bit mess.--Mordecay (talk) 14:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I hesitate to use "alternate timeline" because - and I'll readily admit it may just be me - it seems more limited in scope, like we are referencing an alternate timeline for Azeroth/Draenor only instead of a distinctly separate universe. Aliok (talk) 17:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * From my perspective, an alternate timeline / alternate reality is in effect an "alternate universe". Also, wasn't the premise of WoD explained by Blizzard as Garrosh going back 30 years in time, changing a key event, and as a result created an "alternate universe" separate from ours? Wouldn't that supersede what was referenced to in a novel? -- Alayea (talk / contrib) 19:13, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I could see why at the time it was preferred to having just a small section about the other timeline versions of people for the novels like Thrall: Twilight of the Aspects, since it was not something we'd would likely see often... until Warlords happened. I was never into having (Warlords of Draenor) used from the start, mostly cause it was so much extra to type while editing. Now there is going to be a lot of article moving around. 17:50, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Does Blackmooreverse need its own vote or can it be reconsidered in these comments?--Mordecay (talk) 11:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I think at this point that its ok to give him his own article now. 04:53, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Oki! On it. A couple of questions though. What about other characters - Taretha and Krasus? Can they get their own alternate page? What about mentioned characters such as Arthas, Jaina, Varian, dead-Thrall, Kel'Thuzad, etc... currently their roles in the alternate timeline are mentioned in their main pages. Do these stay or can they have their own pages too? And what about the alternate... Eastern Kingdoms / Azeroth? --Mordecay (talk) 14:52, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Hmm, I think articles that can be longer than 1 paragraph are fine to create, but if nothing noteworthy or just an article with one line is probably a waste. 22:06, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Okay so I'm doing the characters now but not the alternate pages for factions and areas as the info is covered in the characters pages. Alternate-tota Orgrim won't have an article as there is the alternate-wod page and it would be only one sentence about him being killed by Aedelas instead of Lothar. Once the characters are finished I'll link them with their main universe counterparts using {foralt} on top (or in the Trivia section?). Also, is it right to have - Category:Alternate universe characters - or should it be WoD exclusive?--Mordecay (talk) 09:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Should probably use the {foralt} at the top of the page and yes please use the category. 01:49, 2 September 2015 (UTC)