Category talk:Ancients

Sub-section
Would it be terribly wrong to make sub-section categories for Ancient of lore, Ancient of War and such becoming sub-section of Category:Ancients? The desire springs from a confusion of the mess it, for me, seems currently in. TherasTaneel (talk) 22:18, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Sounds like a good idea to me. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 22:19, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I think there's enough of each to do this now. I know I've been thinking about doing this for a while. Would it be Ancients of lore or Ancient of lores? 22:33, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * That sounds like a trick question, I think I'll stop while I'm ahead and cash the check. But just for the record, was it Ancients of lore? TherasTaneel (talk) 22:41, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * "Ancients of Lore," absolutely. "Ancient of Lores" just sounds... Bleh. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 23:05, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Dark is correct. =P 23:48, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * So which are getting their own category? there are currently 5-6 subspecies ingame.--Ashbear160 (talk) 23:50, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd say, give each their own: War, Lore, Protector, Arcane, and corrupted... Blizz will only continue to add more of them as time goes on. 00:00, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * And those that didn't appear ingame yet?(wonder, wind and nordrassil saplings?)--Ashbear160 (talk) 00:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * You aren't going to have enough individuals to fill a category if no individuals exist.-- 00:09, 26 August 2011 (UTC)