User talk:FossilFox

Welcome to Wowpedia!

Hello, FossilFox, and welcome to Wowpedia, the Warcraft wiki! Thank you for your contributions, and we heartily encourage you to continue contributing!

Some links you may find useful:
 * The things to do category has lots of things to keep you busy!
 * Check out the Community portal for some useful editors' links.
 * Many Wowpedians frequent our IRC Channel, on chat.freenode.net, #wowpedia.
 * Finally, please check out the site guidelines and policies!

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wowpedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes as this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, or need help, just ask on the relevant talk page, or visit the site forums. Again, welcome! -- 12:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Weapons notes
Are those notes sourced in lore or it is your imagination? I agree with the connections between weapons and tituls (or names) but no other lore should be used.--Mordecay (talk) 14:21, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I think they should just have speculation tags tacked on, and that'll be good. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 19:16, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, never really had to have a discussion regarding my edits before, so I don't know if I'm doing this right. The notes that were added were based on information taken from the items themselves and the flavor text listed on the heroic versions of the items. I am trying to interpret the possible lore and the idea of the previous owners from said titles and flavor text. I suppose you could label them as speculation if that would help to satisfy any qualms, as some of the items are very vague, and some speculating is require. All of the information I listed was based on lore listed from this very site, and while I may have done some speculating to try and interpret the vagueness, none of it is from my imagination, as was put. If speculation would be more appropriate, classify it as such. I listed it under notes, as I felt that "Trivia" was not entirely appropriate. I thought "Notes" would be more encompassing, and would better adhere to patterns currently seen on this site.-- FossilFox 26 January, 2012