Wowpedia talk:Vandalism policy/Definition1

= Vote on initial definition = ✅ See Wowpedia:Vandalism. This relates directly to Wowpedia:Vandalism policy.

Yes:

 * 1) Fandyllic 1:21 PM PST 5 Jan 2006
 * 2) --Dracomage 11:19, 10 Jan 2006 (EST)
 * 3) Schmidt 11:27, 10 Jan 2006 (EST)
 * 4) Jeoh 11:13, 23 Jan 2006 (EST)

Accepted with 5 Yes votes, 5:0 margin, and waited at least 3 days. --Fandyllic 6:03 PM PST 6 Mar 2006

Comments
I would like to see that we add to our definition of vandalism something with regard to the willfull "destruction" of contributions. Example where a person called "Holy shit" came in and deleted whole sections of posts and added negative comments. This resulted in the ned to restore the previous almost in its entirety. --Dracomage 16:10, 9 Jan 2006 (EST)


 * Added "Removing valid content without explanation or an explanation that makes no sense." to list of things that are vandalism. Hope that covers it.
 * --Fandyllic 7:04 PM PST 9 Jan 2006
 * Yes it does. --Dracomage 11:19, 10 Jan 2006 (EST)

Removed proposal vote template; this is not a policy, this is a definition. See Wowpedia:Vandalism policy for the policy version of this page. --SilverSide 10:42, 30 Jan 2006


 * Hmmm... I suppose this is okay, but the definition is a key part of the policy. --Fandyllic 11:25 AM PST 30 Jan 2006

I locked (protected) Wowpedia:Vandalism, so it won't change unless a proposal is made on this discussion page for a change. Also, if this is not policy, it still needs 5 Yes votes to be accepted by the Wowpedia:Voting policy process. So I'm going to make it a proposal again for at least that method of approval. --Fandyllic 5:012 PM PST 30 Jan 2006

NOTE: This proposal has now reached 5 votes and needs to wait the Vote closed time (3 days) according to voting policy before being accepted. --Fandyllic 1:32 PM PST 28 Feb 2006