Talk:Lihanna

Is this page really necessary? We know absolutely nothing about this character except that there's an item called "Lihanna's Strand". Seems redundant to have a page mostly made up of speculation solely based on a single item name; we don't even know if she's a human or not. With things like Narcissa's Mirror and Big Bag of Booty, we actually know something about the character (and also that it actually is a character), but in this case it's just a name attached to an item with no backstory or context. -- 10:53, 3 June 2017 (UTC)


 * I think I read something about not creating characters based (only) on item names... somewhere... maybe an admin's comment? It was years ago... But yea regarding this one, it even includes speculations and is not linked anywhere so... as much as I love flavor characters, I think it is safe to have it gone. If Blizz will decide to expand the character, then the page can be restored. --Mordecay (talk) 11:16, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Could it be useful for some categories or lists (of paladins, Scarlet Crusaders...) ? Though she could just be included in a section of the appropriate page (Named characters or something). -- MyMindWontQuiet (talk) 11:18, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Just have the Lihanna page redirect to Lihanna's Strand item until we know more. Xporc (talk) 11:31, 3 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Well, the thing is that we don't even know if Lihanna was a paladin or not, or whether she was a member of the Scarlet Crusade, so I don't see which pages we could even include her on. Two of the other artifacts in Scarlet Salvage are named after Uther and Gavinrad (Shroud of Uther and Gavinrad's Sigil), who were obviously never members of the Crusade, and the Crusade has plenty of warriors, hunters, monks, mages, etc. besides just paladins. We also know that the Crusade at least used to have dwarven and high elven members, so there's nothing saying that Lihanna couldn't have been a high elven ranger or something and that Lihanna's Strand was just named after her posthumously for whatever reason. In other words, I think that there's ultimately too many unknowns and uncertainties about the character to really be able to definitely say anything about her/him/it. Agreed with Xporc to just have it as a redirect. -- 11:34, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Agreed with everyone that this page is unnecessary. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 16:42, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok for me Xporc (talk) 16:53, 3 June 2017 (UTC)