Talk:Temple of Elune

Wound vs portal
Didn't they say that the demon portal is in the Tomb of Sargeras? So this is another portal?--Mordecay (talk) 15:36, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I think they said that the original portal was a "wound" later closed by the Titans. The night elves later built a temple on top of it, and now the wound has reopened. -- 15:50, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * They're probably going with that the Temple is the Tomb, as has been speculated for years.ReignTG (talk) 15:52, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, that could work!--Mordecay (talk) 15:54, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I might just be mixing up the different revealed bits, but as I understood it, the temple was built on the closed wound. The wound was closed by the elves of Suramar 12k years ago using the five pillars of creation. The wound has now been reopened, but yeah I'm not really sure if the wound is the same as the "portal" in the tomb. PeterWind (talk) 17:13, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm like 95% sure they said the wound is the portal, which would mean the Temple and Tomb have to be the same building.ReignTG (talk) 13:15, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Opening this discussion again as of Chronicle and the audio dramas. The wound hasn't been mentioned anywhere since Gamescom, while Chronicle and the drama are going forward with the "attempted second front in the WotA." Are we to assume they scrapped the wound then? It's nowhere to be found in beta or anywhere else. ReignTG (talk) 14:18, 4 August 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure I quite understand why it would be scrapped. Yep, it was mentioned only once (and thus would be nice to have more sources of it) but it doesn't mean that it is not true or something. It's actually nice touch of history - the reason (time) of why the temple was built and then what happened there during the War of the Ancients (If that's the case). Or does the Chronicle and the audioseries give a different reason and time? I read both but maybe I missed the bit. Or maybe you think that the interview is not a reliable source?
 * Also, lets say that the Chronicle gives a certain information that is mentioned only there. Would that be a reason to move it to a note section? --Mordecay (talk) 18:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC)