User talk:Nikon4441491

separate groups
You are actually in the wrong to do what you are doing. Just because a guild might not enter a place till after a certain patch, does not give you the right to separate them from the other guilds. 05:31, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


 * And its best if you two work it out on IRC, in-game chat, or a talk page. Rather than constant reverts, or you might find yourself being placed on the vandal page. 05:33, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

I am doing what the server agree on as a majority. If that is the case I would like this page (that I created removed and they can build there on new page). Nikon44


 * Then you need to explain to him. An edit war is not going to solve anything. 05:39, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Just out of curiosity how am I in the wrong for fixing something that i created to start with. We as a server majority decided how it was going to be. This is the second person to mess with this. I understand that this is a free will site and editing can be done by anyone but this is ridiculous to let someone who had no intervention to this page until recently control how he thinks it should be. Nikon44


 * Well obviously people aren't happy with the "Server majority's decision". Out of curiosity, what does it matter if they're noted to only enter the place after 2.4? It seems that it is being done that way because the guilds that were there before 2.4 want some acknowledgment over it. Here's a solution, just add a small note next to the guilds name (like "Attuned for" or "Prior to 2.4") rather than moving other guilds out of the same box. If that doesn't make him happy, and he continues to revert, then add him to the vandal list. 05:58, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

I tried that approach as well we placed (2.4) next to there name and he continued to remove it all the same. From my recent emails it looks like someone else doesn't agree with him. Like I said prior this was a majority vote by the server. I originaly wanted it that way with only the 2.4 next to the name.


 * Oh... well in that case, go ahead and place him back on the vandal list, only reason I even said anything was cause I'm tired of seeing the war go on in the recent changes page. Just undo my edit on the vandals page, and under the summary say I said it was ok. 06:07, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Three-revert rule
Please be warned that you are violating the three revert rule. Any further reverts you make today will result in your temporary blocking from WoWWiki. -- k _d3 06:28, 29 March 2008 (UTC)