Forum:Infoboxes suggestion on articles

I'm asking in a suggestion, for future articles, and possibly a lot of other articles that others may come across something like this.

I'm using the example of the article from Black Widow found in Duskwood, which can be found at my newest Sandbox page.


 * What am I testing?
 * How well the Stub/Other fits. After the npcbox template or before.... And to be straight forward, they should be before the infoboxes. And now about the templates familiar to for...


 * My suggestion
 * The templates that some what use the same box style of the Stub/Other template should be placed BEFORE the templates of infoboxes, and in this case, npcbox. But what I'm also suggesting is the templates, that are like the for template should be placed AFTER the infoboxes. It just to make it neat really. Also if you place the templates like for before the infoboxes, the infoboxes will be pushed down.

For an example of the for placed BEFORE the npcbox see this revision. For an example of the for placed AFTER the npcbox see this revision.

Notice how the for template is on the same exact place but the npcbox template is shifted up and down. What I'm suggesting is to place those templates that are familiar to the for template to be placed after the infoboxes, so it wouldn't push those infoboxes down. -- 10:50, 19 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Semantically, disambiguation should be above article content, because it is not a part of the article; the change you propose is problematic e.g. on the mobile skin, where it would cause the disambiguation to appear between the infobox and the lead-in paragraph. — foxlit (talk) 22:28, 20 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Well, any other solution to fix the "block"? 22:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC)