Talk:Thunder Bluff

I rewrote several sections for clarity. Nothing changed, just cleaned. --Tonktruk (talk) 23:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

AKA the Cow Level. --Azaram 12:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

I fail to see what you're trying to tell us.--Odolwa 20:12, 11 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Pretty much all Blizzard games either include a reference to or have been claimed to contain a cow level., ,  , , .  --Azaram 01:14, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Notes Section
"One of the curious things in Thunder Bluff is the ability to enter a battleground mounted. Since the battlemasters are outside, if you are mounted when you queue for the battleground, and stay mounted until you enter it, you will enter the battleground already mounted and with a significant speed/time advantage."

Shouldn't this be edited or even removed entirely? A few things make this statement mostly incorrect. 1: All battlegrounds, except for Eye of the Storm, place joiners in areas designated as non-outdoors, which will dismount players automatically. 2: The Arathi Basin battlemaster is separate from the rest, inside the Pools of Vision, meaning that players cannot be mounted while entering that battleground from Thunder Bluff. 3: It's possible to enter battlegrounds mounted elsewhere. Holiday weekend representatives are mostly stationed outside, Shattrath City battlemasters are all outside, and you can join Warsong Gulch and Arathi Basin while outside their actual battleground entrances. Only the Alterac Valley battlemaster resides "indoors". 4: It might be possible to enter Eye of the Storm mounted, I haven't tested it myself. That said, it's only an advantage if you join a battleground in progress, and only a slight one at that. --Gordal 14:00, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Also now considering you can enter battlegrounds from anywhere... D Long ownz U (talk) 22:16, 22 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Agreed. It seems like this section should have been removed some time ago. Point 5 (as stated by D Long ownz U) is that you can now queue for and enter battlegrounds mounted from anywhere, via the PvP window. This alone should remove the relevance of the above section. The "significant speed/time advantage" is surely non-existent, for reason 1, and because all battlegrounds have a preparation period before the BG starts anyway. The note was added in October 2006, so I assume that explains at least some of the reason for this being written in the first place; many things were different then.
 * Consequently, I've removed the section ;) If there exists any reason, in contradiction of all the above points, why this note is still valid, please post it here. -- Taohinton (talk) 11:13, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Cataclysm Section
Is the Cataclysm section really necessarily? ( Luxor ( t / c ) 10:41, 14 July 2011 (UTC))
 * No it isn't. If nothing changed a section is not needed pointing out nothing changed. I removed it. 21:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Legion section
It says that the infernals attacked the city as per "Tribemother Torra says: The Legion destroys us in the open fields. Even Thunder Bluff isn't safe from the Infernals." But does that really mean that Thunder Bluff was attacked? The NPC may have just expressed that she fears the infernals may attack the city in the future, no? Thoughts? --Mordecay (talk) 21:44, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * It's possible she was speaking about the battle in the Northern barrens. As for the infernals, well, they drop from the sky, so Thunder Bluff would be threatened indeed... But Thunder Bluff isn't "open fields", so I don't think it was attacked. Still, I guess it's noteworthy? Xporc (talk) 21:53, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Definitely noteworthy, but just how? Currently it states that the city was attacked but the quote doesn't outright states that. --Mordecay (talk) 22:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah but since you found some Mulgore-related things about the Legion Invasion ... Torra's quote + those info seems noteworthy. Like how the Wetlands were an invasion target too. Xporc (talk) 07:12, 4 July 2017 (UTC)