Talk:Tears of Elune

Eonar
Alright, we speculate the Tears might refer to Eonar and not actually Elune - based on what, exactly? This being the only Pillar not named after a confirmed/known titan? Then why would it not be called Tears of Eonar? And why did it then play the role it did in Val'sharah? Makes absolutely no sense to me. Dajax02 (talk) 15:31, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I have to agree. Its speculation that doesn't make sense because all the other titan artifacts have their proper names, showing the night elves clearly knew about the Pantheon. If it represented Eonar, it wouldn't be named after Elune.ReignTG (talk) 15:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Elune is Eonar. Ba dum tss. --Mordecay (talk) 16:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The storyline about the Pillars is far from over. No doubt we'll learn a lot of things about them in the coming months. Xporc (talk) 16:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh I don't doubt that, but this theory is taking it somewhat far. Dajax02 (talk) 16:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Still, it's speculation. It doesn't hurt to keep it until we know more about this artifact's storyline. Remember that there is a a titan complex under the Tomb of Sargeras/Temple of Elune... Xporc (talk) 16:25, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * True enough, but I will remain doubtful. We might get something cleared up there, we might not. But Norgannon doesn't a Pillar named for him either - or mayhaps there are two Pillars we don't about? We'll see I suppose. And where did you get the thing about a titan complex underneath anyway? There was something about 'a wound in the earth' but a complex? Dajax02 (talk) 16:29, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh boy. This is the Chamber of the Avatar. Xporc (talk) 16:34, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh damn. Totally missed that. That is quite something... Dajax02 (talk) 16:35, 2 March 2017 (UTC)