Category talk:Followers icon

Are these pages actually anything? Spot checked a few and they aren't linked to from anywhere... plus no real content on the pages. -- (•) 21:44, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * AFAIK these are the buff that is actually cast on you when you gain a new follower. They are general descriptions of these followers... so they are actually official sources of lore. Follower: Dark Ranger Velonara for example describes what happened to her after being removed from the Scarlet Monastery dungeon. Xporc (talk) 22:02, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Majority of them are used as references for NPCs. --Mordecay (talk) 22:03, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, these are the descriptions on the spells, teaching the followers. In any case they shouldn't be marked as items. If we keep them as is, they should at least have Elinks I'd say. Could we just keep the flavor text as a quote under the character's follower section? PeterWind (talk) 22:14, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think that would be better. -- (•) 22:15, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I think they are fine currently, let's just put "doc=" in their code if you don't want them to be put as common quality items Xporc (talk) 22:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If you go that way, mark them as stubs too. -- (•) 22:21, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I think it'd be better to merge them into the follower pages. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 22:32, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If there is an interest in the associated spell, the spell ID could always be included in an Elinks darktable. PeterWind (talk) 06:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

In?
When exactly these show? Checked Follower: Benjamin Gibb which is supposed to show in Three Feet Under, but looking at its video, what actually shows is the table with abilities and traits and not this. Are these even in the game? --Mordecay (talk) 22:42, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * No, they never actually show in-game. They're entirely back-end placeholders for rewarding a follower. I've long been of the opinion that they should be listed on the follower's page rather than existing separately. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 22:46, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If so, should we even use them in text and as proper sources since they are only in database? --Mordecay (talk) 22:48, 19 April 2018 (UTC)