User talk:Anoob/Archive III

Thanks for the Assit :)
Hey

Thanks for the assit in some corrections,im planing on doing up "My page" was wondering if you could teach me about adding in achivements and what not? We are who we are in this game (talk) 14:59, March 10, 2010 (UTC)Romire

Green dinosaurs
They're coming to get you. 3:07 PM, 15 Mar 2010 (EDT)

Lady Deathwhisper video maintenance
I have mercilessly stuffed many of the videos displayed "full frame" (IE ) into a links section on the Lady Deathwhisper section. Feel free to shuffle them, if you disagree with my selections.

And while you are at it... I noted that the videos with in-video text did not display that text when viewed on the wowwiki page, but did on the youtube page. Do you experience this too? (Lost Society is a good example.) If this is a general thing, we should post warnings about it. --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 21:48, March 26, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!
I'm new to Wiki's and I was wondering how to do that side bar thing on my Guild page. Thank you!

haha noobie question again :x
okay since your the only person i know here so far, and im not sure where to find this out.

is it okay to make my personal user page look like a mock up monster page? as a type of satire? or is that against the rules?

Love, Shoartie~* 05:22, April 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * You can, but do not categorize it as anything it is really not.-- 05:26, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

The exact AP of a mob?
Hullo there, A'noob... the other day I was walking around with a paladin-tank I got and tried to place my talents in the most hefty build imaginable. Among the stuff I browsed was Vindication which at lvl 80 with 2/2 gives damaging attacks a chance to reduce the AP of a mob with 574. Curious on how much dmg of a mob this would reduce, I searched teh internetz and found a article on tankspot.com (some page dedicated to tanking and the like) with some tests conducted by a warrior and hunter on Maexxna. While my ability of reading graphs is of rather low quality (...), the results imply that the AP of a lvl 80 mob boss has 573 AP. This somewhat "matches" Vindication's reduction by 574, the warrior's (talented) reduction by 574 and the druid's (also talented)  reduction by 575. I noticed that it apparently isn't any exact formulas for calculating the AP of a mob on the wowwiki AP-article, so I was wondering if anything I've mentioned here is worth putting onto it. You seems to be a smart guy, what do you think of all this? :D WrathOfDeathfrost (talk) 16:56, April 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * My head hurt.
 * I did not read the whole article (you can blame me), but all this is purely speculated theory crafting no?
 * 20:29, April 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * Gyah, it's not! x(( It's careful empirical observation on official numbers! What I'm stating here is the clear relation between different AP-reductions, which (according to the tests I mentioned) reduces the AP of a lvl 80 boss to zero. As there are no clear formulas for how to calculate the AP of a mob, this could perhaps be used to create such a formula, or at least a logical assumption of it. At least read my wall of text before grilling me! \(x_x) /
 * WrathOfDeathfrost (talk) 09:29, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

Correcting errors
Your elite skills is required here as you seem more than able :) Thanks TherasTaneel (talk) 13:24, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Guild stubs
I'm not really sure what you are thinking, but http://www.wowwiki.com/index.php?title=Guild:Spetsnaz_%28Garona_US%29&diff=2241477&oldid=2241475 is not a guild stub. -- 00:20, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Undercity Census
In Better Late Than Never it is called the "Royal Overseers of the Undercity Census". But I guess that'll do too. TherasTaneel (talk) 21:35, May 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * It means the Royal Overseers are a couple of people in the Undercity Census. ... oh and the Undercity Census is doing their big count this year, that they do every 10years. 21:43, May 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * Thought about that, but...oh never mind :) TherasTaneel (talk) 21:45, May 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree with Coobra, I belived the Royal Overseers are a couple of people in the Undercity Census. Beside, Stormwind Census exist too, and its members are the Royal Factors of the Stormwind Census.
 * 06:43, May 6, 2010 (UTC)

Oy, my eyes!
Ouch, you blinkin' vandal! Just wait! My revenge will be slow, excruciating, and '''woefully incomplete! --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 18:28, May 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * MY MY MY _Johnny Gill_EYES --Knighthonor (talk) 13:15, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

Image vs File
I noted you changed several thumbnails on various files from [Image to [File. What is the practical difference between these, that motivates you to do this? --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 18:31, May 17, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well sometimes ago (forgot when), all pictures where named Image:NAME.EXT, and then all went black and white and black again and white twice, and when I woke up they were all transformed into File:NAME.EXT
 * My guess is that this is a change opered by Wikia on all its wiki, and then I followed the changes, moving the one I found along my way.
 * Note that some admins have Bots to replace Image by File, and that File is one character smaller than Image! xD
 * 18:38, May 17, 2010 (UTC)


 * Fairly recently for whatever reason by wiki, images on pages using Image: have appeared in the Special:UnusedFiles. To counteract this we've been replacing Image: with File:. 19:03, May 17, 2010 (UTC)

Head Alchemist Gigglefont
Um... you created a Goblins template that included one Head Alchemist Gigglefont among their number. He really ought to have a page, if he exists at all, eh? I couldn't find him on wowhead as an NPC. Is he from the books? --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 19:21, May 20, 2010 (UTC)


 * Sourced with the following articles:
 * Goblin alchemist
 * Alchemists' Union
 * Hostile Takeover
 * He seems to come from Dark Factions
 * 20:39, May 20, 2010 (UTC)


 * "The Alchemists’ Union: They deal with alchemy, cross-breeding and science in general. Their greatest creations are the dread hobgoblins. Head Alchemist Gigglefont, runs the Union." -- Dark Factions pg 116. 20:54, May 20, 2010 (UTC)


 * That's the extent of the lore on him? That's it?  Pretty darned sparce. --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 21:06, May 20, 2010 (UTC)


 * Probably why the article doesn't exist yet. 21:10, May 20, 2010 (UTC)

Regarding Skybreaker Nomenclature
"06:32, February 18, 2010 A'noob (Talk | contribs) m (25,413 bytes) (Its name is The Skybreaker, not Skybreaker)" Please see here. http://www.wowwiki.com/Talk:The_Skybreaker --Mondoblasto (talk) 02:30, May 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh god, it just occured to me, you didn't change all of the others to the wrong way, did you? D: --Mondoblasto (talk) 04:33, May 24, 2010 (UTC)

Oi! Where are my royalties, buster?
Using my quotes and not paying me, eh? :P --Joshmaul (talk) 02:16, May 25, 2010 (UTC)

Cataclysm: Blasted Lands
All info is directly from Wowhead. No citations needed. (Wowman12 (talk) 17:33, May 30, 2010 (UTC))


 * Show me where please, for the Dreamaul Hold in an horde town, because if it is only based on the Alpha screen, it is not valid :)
 * 17:55, May 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * Lol address is here: http://www.wowhead.com/guide=cataclysm&world (Just scroll down) (Wowman12 (talk) 19:50, May 30, 2010 (UTC))


 * Thanks.
 * 20:43, May 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * Just to address the comment "No citations needed". Citations are always needed. If you transfer info from another site like wowhead, how are we to know? We can't assume all info you posted is from one place, this is why we cite the information so we KNOW where it came from. 00:48, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Re: 3.9.0

 * 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie !
 * 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie !
 * 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie !
 * 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie !
 * 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie !
 * 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie !
 * 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie !
 * 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie !
 * 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie !
 * 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie !
 * 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie !
 * 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie !
 * 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie !
 * 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie !
 * 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie !
 * 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie !
 * 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie !
 * 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie ! 3.9.0 is a lie !
 * 17:49, June 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, was there a reason for that? --Joshmaul (talk) 23:02, June 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * Your comment on Talk:Patch 3.9.0#Delete this page
 * Sorry *grin*
 * 09:13, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Bookfooter
I'll happily help with the switch from to Bookfooter if you'd like, just let me know when it's ready and any special instructions. Drazisil (t/c) 12:13, June 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * You can switch them, the new one is fully operational.
 * Replace by TYPE when ever you find one, or check What Links to Template:Books for a full list.
 * Have fun :)
 * 22:31, June 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * What about World of Warcraft: The Magazine and Short stories? Pretty much done otherwise.[[Image:IconSmall_DrakeAzure.gif]] Drazisil (t/c) 03:08, June 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, I wouldn't call them comics. Don't know how many Blizz plan to continue to make at 4 a year (but for how long), I'd give them their own footer. 04:29, June 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * Added a Magazine and Short story sections. Short story only covers Online Short Story, because other Short Story are covered in the RPG section.
 * 07:25, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Your Sig
How'd you get your sig to appear like that? I put it in my sig, hit preview, then copy paste it into the message to add...is there a different way to do it? -- Astus the Graven One


 * Just create a page under your userspace, such as User:Drazisil/Sig and then place that in your sig as
 * Make sure the custom sig button is checked.[[Image:IconSmall_DrakeAzure.gif]] Drazisil (t/c) 01:34, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! -- [[Image:Inv_staff_78.png | 20px |]] Astus the Graven One 21:26, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

Image of Drakuru
Please note that both wowhead and thottbot are schizophrenic about the Image of Drakuru character IDs. Some IDs are listed as starting/ending more than one quest; some quests link to alternate IDs that don't link back to that character ID, etc. the 26500 ID seems to be the "most stable" of the set. --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 20:55, June 16, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well I used the position more than the quest, since we know the zones to go, I more or less guessed which ID is which image.
 * 20:57, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

DEHTA
What possessed you to change the category name? --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 18:28, June 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * Same reason that the Article moved from DETHA to its full real name. Same goes for BOOM.
 * 13:30, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

um
How is that video not a contribution to the lich king?


 * Because we tend to remain serious on the content we add to articles.
 * 22:52, June 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * And thats a serious song on how tragic the lich kings life from arthas to death did you even watch the video?


 * As "good" as it can be, we will keep out the fan videos.
 * You are of course free to ask an admin on the topic.
 * 22:59, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Torch catching guide
Two things...
 * 1) you might be well on your way to joining the "stop the frivolous splitting of quest pages" camp. Or at least seeing one of the reasons for it.
 * 2) There are factions that disagree with sub-pages on a philosophical basis. You might find it more convenient to rename Torch Catching/Guide to Catching Torches to something more like Guide to Catching Midsummer Juggling Torches.

--Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 18:20, June 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree some quests, should not be split, but we argue for long on this and even admins are not all on the same side.
 * So, do as you like Ratchy! ;p
 * 18:23, June 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Not sure I completely understand your comment about this Eirik Ratcatcher, but if you check the history, I think the original article name was closer to your suggestion (and I was a bit taken aback at the name change with no reason, especially as I was about to put in some links to it, lol). Was my original name for it a violation? Keyesc (talk) 18:26, June 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * In fact I believed that adding it in quest articles would be more easy to find. (no violation at all)
 * 18:31, June 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * I created the article using the section headings as described in the WoWwiki Manual of Style. You changed them in a subsequent edit with no reason listed.  Please advise.  Keyesc (talk) 18:43, June 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Ah... The problem came that A'noob transcluded the entire article in Torch Catching (Alliance) and Torch Catching (Horde). The section headings do not match well with the headings on those pages.   I think in this case that...
 * The page should be reverted to the old name (or something like it)
 * the quests should use main to point to said page, and include a one or two paragraph summary of the page.
 * If A'noob desires, the contents of the "section+main" can be in the current Quest:xxxx/subpage name, in a Template:something name, completely inline, or something else. But using summary/Main avoids the whole header ranking issue, as well as keeping the quest pages from gratuitously including a level of detail that verges on incompatable with the page.  I can do this if you guys want, or one of you can take the lead.  I'm easy. --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 21:54, June 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * I am not yet familiar with main. Also, is there a guideline for when to transclude vs. just providing a link?  Keyesc (talk) 03:22, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia's Main template describes what I believe to be the standard for the convention of main. Guideline?  Rule of thumb, really: "if what you're describing can stand as a page of its own, it probably should BE a page of its own."  Size is a large factor in the choice.  Beyond that it is a stylistic choice that we don't have formalized to my knowledge.  My initial comment seems to have mutated into a larger discussion... --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 18:59, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Let's revert to "Guide to Torch blabla". But I believe a simple link offers less visibility.
 * Your choice Keyesc.
 * 06:25, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Why I suggested a summary to go with the link. --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 18:59, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

You told me you would be back :'(
But you aren't D: xDDD.

I've finished with the list I had, no more to copy-paste. However, there's still some locations missing, so feel free to add whichever you recall without me editing each 5 seconds :P.--Lon-ami (talk) 19:21, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

Cataclysm release date
What book 1 do you mean!? The release date for this book is 09/27/10, it will hit stores on 10/19/10. Thus August should be only game release. Edit: I forgot to sign, sorry. --N&#39;Nanz (talk) 14:39, July 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * Your link gives the release/selling date for The Shattering, but not for Cataclysm.
 * You are assuming that the game will be released in August, because the book will deal about the Cataclysm, but it is not certain, Rise of the Lich King came moments after WotLK. Catalsym could be released months after The Shattering.
 * There is no "fact" in the date you give us (or did I miss a line in your link?)
 * 14:47, July 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * In the article it's written: "(...) An avid player of Blizzard’s MMORPG World of Warcraft, Golden has written several novels in that world (Arthas, Lord of the Clans, Rise of the Horde) with more in the works, including The Shattering: Prelude to Cataclysm, due out in August 2010 (...)"
 * "The Shattering" is the prelude to "World of Warcraft: Cataclysm", the game. There is no book called "Cataclysm". Now we know the release/selling dates for "The Shattering" thus what's happening in August but the release of the game??? xD
 * --N&#39;Nanz (talk) 15:02, July 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * "Cataclysm" was refering to the Game. I'll try to explain myself better.
 * The dates you found are the dates of the book The Shattering, they have nothing do to with the game Cataclysm and should not be mentionned in the game's article
 * The Shattering is a prelude to the game Cataclysm, so the prelude is to be released in August, but that does not give us a release date for the game Cataclysm.
 * 15:09, July 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * No, you're wrong.
 * Release date of "The Shattering": 09/27/10; (look left column)
 * Selling date of "The Shattering": 10/19/10; (look left column)
 * Release of "World of Warcraft: Cataclysm": August 2010 --N&#39;Nanz (talk) 19:23, July 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm really sorry N'Nanz, I'm half-dumb and half-blind xD
 * Where do you read?
 * "Release of "World of Warcraft: Cataclysm": August 2010"
 * 05:25, July 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * "Cataclysm, due out in August 2010" --N&#39;Nanz (talk) 10:25, July 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * The Shattering: Prelude to Cataclysm (ISBN-10: 1416550747), due out in August 2010
 * Proper association is everything. --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 20:00, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Proper association is everything. --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 20:00, July 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * Ah! Someone can still understand me! I'm not finished! xD
 * 05:22, July 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * The Shattering: Prelude to Cataclysm, due out in October 2010 --N&#39;Nanz (talk) 10:24, July 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * The release date of the book varies with the source, but I am quasi sure that your link give a date for the book, not the game (which is IMO, very very very very very very very very very very unfinished for a launch August)
 * 12:14, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

What really happened?
Moved to Forum:What is Arthas alignment?

Thankyou for editing help :)
Hey,

Just a quick thankyou for helping-out with getting guild logo working properly; sporadically edit guild pages and can be classified as a WoWwiki nub. :)

Rescindent (talk) 14:31, July 8, 2010 (UTC)Rescindent


 * You're welcome.
 * 14:43, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

Battle for WoWwiki
Please do not delete our page A'noob! Sl2059 (talk) 10:46, July 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * Get it to your user namespace. It does not belong to the main space dude.
 * 10:48, July 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * Ok,so can you get it back for a sec,so i can copy it?...


 * Ask Gourra for this, I am not an admin :)
 * 10:57, July 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * You're not? I always thought you were. lol — EGingell (T|C|F)  14:33, July 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * Nope, I prefer being a lazy peon xD
 * 14:35, July 12, 2010 (UTC)

3RR
You need to re-read the WP:3RR policy. Reversions which span a time greater than 24 hours are not covered by this policy. -- 12:53, July 13, 2010 (UTC)


 * Ok. It falls under adding nonsense so?
 * 13:11, July 13, 2010 (UTC)

Scythe of Elune
"Please read my edits' comment: Arugal's story has been changed a bit, now he did not only used Ur's reasearches, but also the Scythe of Elune.

15:53, July 19, 2010 (UTC)"


 * I had no idea. Could you post the source behind this information? -- 16:08, July 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * All is explained during the Worgen starting experience
 * 16:23, July 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * Actually, I've read through everything, and Arugal is only mentioned once, and not in any relations to the Scythe. I think this is merely a misinterpretation made by worldofraids, and since it's not a cannon source, it should be removed. I'm usually not in doubt about your edits, as you tend to be spot-on, but in this particular case, I think you're wrong. Without a proper source attached to the statements that "Arugal messed with the Scythe", it shouldn't be there.
 * -- 17:48, July 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * All is not written in WoWWiki yet, and the fact that Arugal messed with the Scythe seems to be the report of many beta testers. But you can choose to be careful, go on, we can always get it back later :)
 * 17:50, July 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * Without a proper source, it can be a massive misinterpretation. I've been watching the quest lines and dialogues, and can't find it anywhere. Might come in later, though, but as of yet, I prefer to be on the safe side. Also, Velinde is supposed to have held the Scythe at the time Arugal summoned the worgen. Looking forward to seeing how this turns out, though.
 * -- 17:59, July 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * It is still possible that people pointing out holes in lore may cause Blizzard to alter quest information (etc). I would definitely put "changes re Scythe of Elune found in the Worgen starting experience" in the category of "not confirmed".  I am also hoping that we preserve any "pre-retcon" lore changes. --Eirik Ratcatcher :::(talk) 19:31, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

WP:RFA
Please sign your nomination =) 14:37, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

Reverted template edits
The reason we added c-inline to templates/template heads is because the game isn't out yet and because some zones are undergoing massive changes, and not because we felt it needed distinguishing otherwise.

I'm reverting your edits. --Sky (t · c) 14:47, July 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * I've created Forum:Inline expansion icons on zone templates to discuss this. 15:31, July 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * You might do better to bring that over to Forum:Removal of T:RPG and T:Cat, a related discussion. --Sky (t · c) 15:37, July 21, 2010 (UTC)

Capitals
Sorry for making some extra work for you. The fact i don't agree with much of the naming and styling policy on the wiki -- thus i don't make any effort to follow it -- is why i don't -- and why people shouldn't want me to -- ever do major edits outside my userspace anymore. Capitals was just falling ito disarray, so something had to be done. Again, sorry. :/ -- 12:11, July 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * No prob.
 * Already on it.
 * 12:13, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

Rakh'likh
You can check every article. None are actually linking to it. The job queue is choking atm. Once the job queue is running smoothly again, all those links will disappear. --Sky (t · c) 14:20, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Articles
Is it OK, i created a Flamekin article and a Terrorfiend (race) article is that OK? Hallowseve15 (talk) 13:34, August 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes it is!
 * Just isn't Fiend the same thing as Terrorfiend?
 * 13:36, August 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * People keep saying its a Subspecies to the Fiend. So I thought i'd create it. Hallowseve15 (talk) 13:43, August 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Ok, Just moving the mob to Terrorfiend (mob) and the race to Terrorfiend
 * 13:58, August 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the Help A'noob. Hallowseve15 (talk) 14:17, August 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Whats the criteria that makes them a subspecies? 19:06, August 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Personnaly, I see the exact same creature when looking a Fiend and a so-called Terrorfiend.
 * 21:38, August 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Exactly... if anything, the proper name of these fiends is probably terrorfiends, cause it seems a majority of them (according to wowhead) have terror in their name, be it terrorguard, fiend, or master. fiend models 21:43, August 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * I suggest deletion, and any futher debate can go to Talk:Terroguard
 * 22:02, August 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree. 22:07, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Adminship
Congratulations! Your RFA has passed. You now have access to the sysop toolset. Please ask any active admin if you have questions about the tools. -- k_d3 02:03, August 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * Welcome to the jungle. 02:05, August 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * We've got fun and games? -- 02:15, August 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * We got everything you want! Gratz man.-- 02:20, August 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * You're now an admin on a boat. --Sky (t · c) 02:30, August 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * Speaking about "everything I want", isn't there some piece of this thing called "cata beta key" left? xD
 * 17:06, August 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * Fire off an email to kirkburn. >.> -- k_d3 17:23, August 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * It's gonna blow!
 * 17:50, August 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * Congratulations from Eastern Europe! I'm sure you'll do an exemplary job. --Ragestorm (talk) 19:59, August 10, 2010 (UTC)


 * Hey, we finally added you to the list at Wowpedia:Administrators - you might want to write an actual description for yourself. -- 16:42, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

Images
As an admin you can view the deleted image without having to restore it. Just scroll down to the file history. =) 23:09, August 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, it seems so -_-"
 * 23:11, August 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for fixing Wowpedia:List of unique character icons.. I wasn't looking forward to doing it myself =P 00:28, August 16, 2010 (UTC)


 * No prob, can't sleep anyway.
 * Anything else while I am around?
 * 00:43, August 16, 2010 (UTC)


 * Nothing comes to mind... unless you want to stack all those returned books in a neat pile over in that corner, I'll have a warlock come by later and set them ablaze, muahahahaa ... I miss doing Karazhan. 00:46, August 16, 2010 (UTC)


 * I am the "Old Days Rusher", meet the tauren on Medivh EU!
 * 00:49, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Responding about Ner'zhul
Moved to Talk:Ner'zhul

SMW
I have a question about SMW. I wonder why Diseased Timber Wolf is not a part of it. I cannot browse from there. Hans Kamp (talk) 18:31, August 17, 2010 (UTC)


 * I am affraid I cannot help you on this. But I can find Diseased Timber Wolf in the google search.
 * 18:33, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * The SMW properties of that page are assigned by the Npcbox template, so if that happens you need to perform a null edit on the page to get the SMW properties to show up. -- 18:39, August 17, 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I will try that latter, doing a null edit. Hans Kamp (talk) 18:48, August 17, 2010 (UTC)


 * That was successful. Now you can browse from there. :) Hans Kamp (talk) 18:49, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

My comment on Shadowmourne
Hey, you removed my note on the Shadowmourne page about him accidentally deleting his weapon because "my source was myself".

I was asked by my guild to make the edit because I was one of the few that already had a wowwiki account, and when you added that I needed citation, we as a guild emailed sites such as wow.com and mmochampion with screenshots and the like, trying to get them to post something we could link as a source.

The only other thing we could think of was a post on our forums talking about the incident. Apologies that I couldn't get the officer who made the deletion to make the post himself, but he's a busy guy. Was the problem with the source that he hadn't commented on the thread himself? I'm just trying to understand how I can get the post reinstated, we thought it was pretty hilarious at his expense, and we didn't think anyone else in the world had ever done this particular stupid thing, making it a pretty big deal in our eyes :)


 * Sure that is an event to note, but the lack of source makes it hard to keep. Not that I do not believe it really happen, but except your own word, there is no article on mmo or wow.com (can't believe they did not posted about this), no screen or anything else.
 * 10:50, August 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * Fair enough, thanks for the quick response. But yea, I guess with all the Cata news, a deleted SM isn't something worth posting? He got it back within two days via GM ticket though, lucky! :P Pity I can't get anyone to act as a reliable source, the officer who did it is quite stubborn and sick of us making fun, he won't post in the thread I started :( Thanks again for your help :)


 * Cata can die now, Deleted SM is good for us!
 * You're welcome.
 * 15:16, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

rofl
This fuckwad takes out other peoples' useful edits and replaces them with the exact same thing to make it look like he's doing it all. FUCK YOU BITCH.s


 * I would be glad if you explain this to me in details.
 * Sincerely yours.
 * 16:26, August 19, 2010 (UTC)