Talk:Pandaren ideas


 * 1) FF2222

Who is Mandy?
I find it annoying that a vast array of rumors text is attributed to someone whith no explanation who they are. --Fandyllic2:29 PM PST 25 Jan 2006


 * Yes, this should have it's own page, like Mandy's Pandaren proposal. And Xmuskrat should be more objective. "Any but Pandaren" is completely stupid; do the penis-headed slugs have as much chances as the Pandaren ? Or if you copied it, at least put the name of the author !--Kirochi 17:53, 25 Jan 2006 (EST)


 * I wrote neither of these.  One is Gaming Steve, the other is Mandy from the WoW Forums, who posts this article here once a week for the last year. --Xmuskrat 09:10, 26 Jan 2006 (EST)


 * I figured out who Mandy is and added the info and links to WoW forums. --Fandyllic 11:24 AM PST 26 Jan 2006


 * Well, good job ^^ And sorry XMuskrat =P--Kirochi 16:09, 26 Jan 2006 (EST)


 * No problem. We all work together to make stuff better. :)  --Xmuskrat 17:10, 26 Jan 2006 (EST)

That's not enough for me !
Despite my conviction that Draenei will be that race we're talking about, my loving-Pandarenmind points out THAT : However, due to various complex reasons, there is now a zero percent chance of this happening. "Various complex reasons" ? Wtf ? Does he think we're too stupid to understand these reasons, to come to the entire occulting of them ? Please, sir, I want some more, or otherwise I'll gently bust out your debunking !--Kirochi 19:09, 19 Dec 2005 (EST)


 * That's Gaming Steve for ya. If you don't quote sources or reasons, there's a great chance that you'll be unverifiably right for a time.  And it's crap shoots.  You "officially" debunk one race, and since there really are so many to chose from, you might look like you have inside information.  --GamingSteve (kidding Xmuskrat) 09:08, 26 Jan 2006 (EST)


 * Thanks a lot for whoever posted this reply xD--Kirochi 16:07, 26 Jan 2006 (EST)


 * heh. I'm not Gaming Steve. :)   I have emailed him before to verify rumors, he at least is able to talk like he knows more then he does.  He was actually talking with me about 1.12 stuff.  --Xmuskrat 17:09, 26 Jan 2006 (EST)


 * As we, people from WoWwiki, usually do about rumored races xD--Kirochi 17:14, 26 Jan 2006 (EST)


 * Just a thought, why does anyone listen to gaming steve? it seems like half the stuff he gets wrong and the other half is stuff he got from other rumors already in circulation... DevilDude 1:10 PST 04/16/06


 * I agree, he seems to be the definition of a "hack journalist". That's why I put "Gaming Steve is a dubious source, but could be considered an industry insider" on the Rumored Races page early on. --Fandyllic 1:25 PM PDT 16 Apr 2006


 * Yep. We're just lsiting these ideas here in a rumor section, so it's easy for people to get all the rumors in.  We try very hard to make sure rumor areas and non-rumor areas never mix.  --Xmuskrat 13:46, 19 April 2006 (EDT)

==I'M NOT SURE WHAT TO DO==

Is it okay I based some of my fan fic of someone else's? I hope they dint mind, Im really not that imaginative.

Mini Pets
After viewing one of Samwise's art, I found a piece called "hall of the pandyr king". I noticed that sitting by the foot of a king is a bulldog or something similar to it. That is when i came up with the idea of a bull dog minipet sinec almost every race has a mini pet. There could be a brown one, a black one and a gray one. Didn't want to add it to the page since it is your page.

Hero Class
Who said a Hero Class meant just a change in abilities? There could be a Hero Race/Class for further expansions. Seeing as Pandarians rarely leave their home, and so few of them are encountered in the world. Not to mention they're only Brewmasters, why not have a future hero class be named Pandarian Brewmaster. I honestly have no other details about this other than just what i thought up.

Fate of the page
So... What now? Personally, I think this page is a haphazard mess of fanfiction and speculation with a little bit of lore scattered about; now that we actually HAVE Pandaren, I see little reason for its continued existence. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 08:46, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I suppose we could keep it for historical reasons... but eh, I agree with it being removed. 09:06, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I think it should be kept, but shoved in a corner.-- 17:20, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what historical value it has, since at least 60% of this page is content that really should have been on userpages in the first place. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 23:18, 22 October 2011 (UTC)