Talk:A Warrior Made--Part 1

File:Warrior Made.jpg --Mordecay (talk) 20:54, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Although it is the same of the section, a redirect is fine, but for Wiki's sake... it looks better with the one dash. 01:43, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * You could just use an endash: – or an emdash: &mdash; That's what enwiki does. -- k_d3 06:56, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure including special characters in the title is making it any easier for users to type the name of the page. Also, don't put move tags until you've reached a conclusion on this debate. Xporc (talk) 07:01, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * As long as there are redirects from typeable options the title after the redirect can be whatever you want. Just don't delete the redirects. -- k_d3 07:08, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Disagree, don't think that's a good options. Redirects shouldn't be the main point of entry for a page IMO. Xporc (talk) 07:48, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirects aren't made to link that from an article; redirects are suppose to be just for helpful redirection to the right article that relates in some way. Like if we name a NPC Cho'Rush the Observer, we would create Cho'Rush as a helpful redirection or how patches get just number redirects to just be simple and faster, e.g. Patch 7.3.5 and 7.3.5. And kd3, I like that dash I alot more than just the regular "minus" one. 10:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The reason I requested this Move in the first place is to just redirect this current one to the new dash just so it just looks nicer on Wowpedia. I don't see any issue with it being a section; unless it was the name of the book. If you think about it, the new one is just the two current ones combined as well as adding a space on both sides for breathing room. Right now the name for the two articles just looks silly. 10:32, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Any progress on this? Xporc (talk) 20:26, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't know. More opinions on this could help. 14:44, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * IMO current name is fine. Doesn't need the user the write special characters in the wiki research bar or the URL bar to find it. Don't know about other people. Xporc (talk) 14:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Using a special character would be different, but redirects were made to make it easier. Can even settle with the regular - dash; the whole point of this move is to make the article look nice. 14:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)


 * For me too, current name seems ok since this is how it is used in the book. --Mordecay (talk) 14:53, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The article name looks silly with two dashes, using just one dash or using the emdash (just combining the two dashes pretty much) makes the article just look nice on the wiki. No harm done. 15:05, 23 April 2018 (UTC)