Category talk:Fixed devices

While I can observe the distinction mentioned, I believe that a natural outgrowth of observing it strictly would be to create categories such as "fixed devices by zone", into which the vast majority of the contents of "objects by zone" would go. That is, each zone would have a "fixed devices in X" as well as "objects in X", which currently seems impractical. --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 19:29, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Objects in this category
This category confuses me every time I stumble across it. Maybe it's just because it's late here, but the description on Fixed Device makes my head spin. We also have Spawned object, which doesn't have a category. Then we have all our objects by zone categories. I feel this category is due for some kind of "update" although I'm not sure where to start. PeterWind (talk) 02:02, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I don't see the point when we have "Category: objects" : / Xporc (talk) 09:03, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
 * While there certainly are differences between the functionality between these various objects, I'm not sure who would be looking up objects, based on whether or not they despawn after use. PeterWind (talk) 09:58, 12 August 2017 (UTC)