Forum:Garrison missions mobs

Should garrison missions targets (exclusive ones, not the ones that already exist in the world) have their own pages or no?
 * While I agree that they would be like flavor characters (or like mentioned characters from books), their articles would contain the same sentence: The NPC is located in X and is a target of garrison mission Y (like Magma Elemental (garrison mission)). Because of this I'm inclined to say no. --Mordecay (talk) 19:38, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * For the same reason that we have mount journal and pet journal characters, I would say yes. PeterWind (talk) 22:52, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I have to decline for just random "mobs", maybe named ones, but not ones like Magma Elemental. 04:15, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I think I agree with Coobra here. Named characters may be at least somewhat noteworthy enough to warrant a page (for example, the Lessons of the Blade mission features Blademaster Yozshura, which was also one of the random blademaster names in WCIII, which could be an interesting trivia note if nothing else), but nameless, generic creatures... not so much. -- 14:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)