Template talk:Dragonflightfooter/Plagued Dragonflight

"Ashbear160: Proto-drakes are not part of the plagued dg"
 * The article to this template says otherwise...--LemonBaby (talk) 14:57, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * It seems to me the onus of proof would be to show that they AREN'T part of it, rather than that they are, since I see no reason why they wouldn't be. The Scourge is making a plagued dragonflight, plagued proto-drakes show up in Scourge-controlled Northrend, ergo it's logical to believe that they're part of the plagued dragonflight. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 17:19, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Does it ever state that the plagued protodrakes are part of the plagued df? because Protodrakes are not the typical dragonkin that are part of df(which are the groups created by the titans and it's offshots dragonflight).
 * And the article source doesn't even hint that they are part of the plagued df, whetever they are part of it or not it i think it qualifies as speculation.--Ashbear160 (talk) 17:33, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Unless there's any proof that either the plagued protodrakes are part of the group called plagued df(which as far as i checked they aren't, they are just called abominable) or protodrakes in general are called part of their respective dragonflight(which i know they aren't), i suggest we leave as it is.--Ashbear160 (talk) 17:33, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The difference is that the plagued proto-drakes are made by the Scourge, rather than being "wild" like other proto-drakes. And Ashbear, please tell me you're smart enough to realize that "abominable" is an adjective, not someone naming a group. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 17:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * yes i know it's an adjective, i'm just saying that's the only thing they have been called.
 * But are they part of the Plagued DF? because members of the DF are specificly working for the DF, and all we know of this DF is that it was born of black eggs in scholomance, after that nothing... and the Plagued Proto-drakes have never been said to be part of any, they are nothing more than undead mounts.
 * Anyway i will concede and if you feel like it, i will not contest putting the plagued proto-drake in this template, there are just battles that aren't worth fighting for--Ashbear160 (talk) 17:50, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * As long as you don't put the protodrakes in the other sub-templates.--Ashbear160 (talk) 18:06, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * No no, the others are fairly clearly wild, unaffiliated dragons... But plagued dragons are unique in that they exist solely as a product of the Scourge. Any plagued proto-drakes would have to, by virtue of their own existence, be part of the plagued dragonflight. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 18:09, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Like i said i still don't think that's the case, but i will not oppose the change anymore, so feel free to revert my revert--Ashbear160 (talk) 18:12, 3 October 2011 (UTC).
 * I agree with Dark T Zeratul. It is pretty far stretched to say that two differnet kind of plagued dragons working for the same force are not part of the same "group". Since the plagued protos are referred as part of the experiment in the article I will change it back for now.--LemonBaby (talk) 18:47, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The connection to Scholomance is never mentioned, but it seems clear to me that it is the same project.-- 19:17, 3 October 2011 (UTC)