Talk:Zandalar troll

Deletion vote
Vote Voided, merged with Zandalar tribe.

Votes
Delete

Keep

Comments
A deletion vote shouldn't be used to vote on a merger. 04:52, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I wasn't getting a response anyway else. [[Image:inv_helmet_44.png|22px]]  (talk contribs) 19:46, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Merge
With such little information I believe this should be merged with Zandalar tribe like how Sandfury tribe is the same as Sandfury trolls.  (talk contribs) 01:05, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Agreed. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * If you don't mind i'd like to re-open this request. [[Image:inv_helmet_44.png|22px]]  (talk contribs) 02:03, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I would compare it more to the sand trolls and the Sandfury Tribe. 02:48, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Probably a better example. But still the same idea. [[Image:inv_helmet_44.png|22px]]  (talk contribs) 03:31, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * In the Troll Compendium the Sandfury and the Sand trolls had an seperate article. The Zandalari did not. --LemonBaby (talk) 07:06, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * If we do end up merging these. Perhaps we should merge the Dark Trolls as well. [[Image:inv_helmet_44.png|22px]]  (talk contribs) 04:17, 18 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Just throwing this note here
 * "like how Dark Iron Clan is the same as Dark Iron Dwarves."
 * Actually they are Dark Dwarves according to the magazine.--Ashbear160 (talk) 20:59, 31 March 2012 (UTC)


 * That's besides the point. [[Image:inv_helmet_44.png|22px]]  (talk contribs) 21:00, 31 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Hence throwing the note or more correctly a correction.--Ashbear160 (talk) 21:02, 31 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Whatever, I'll work on the dark dwarves article later if you want. I just want your opinion of this article. [[Image:inv_helmet_44.png|22px]]  (talk contribs) 21:05, 31 March 2012 (UTC)


 * They have only been called "dark dwarves" once. Unlike the other two clans, they have never had confusion about their name until the magazine.-- 21:07, 31 March 2012 (UTC)


 * As long as the whole information from this article is there i don't have any troubles.
 * I think actually the Magazine just clarified that particular situation.--Ashbear160 (talk) 21:10, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Review
There are several Class/Faction/Race/Land ambiguation pages, pages about races linked several times as factions in other articles (example: "|affiliation = Tauren") and other mixes. In fact I think that we should split every single page of this like I (tried) to explain in Forum:Problem of ambiguation. I'm not sure if what I tried to explain was understandable, so I will list the cases: Pages like Quel'Thalas, Durotar and Gilneas (this last formerly, thanks to MgTG) merge faction pages like Kingdom of Quel'Thalas and Nation of Durotar with their respective lands. Other merge the race with its factions; like the Tauren, the Forsaken (again, thanks to this generally blessed editor this last is formerly too) and maybe others. So I'm completely against merge any faction/race/land/class articles between them: one article per topic. So my word is: "SPLIT THEM ALL!!!!!! DON'T MERRRRRGE!". Any reasonable comments?Gabrirt (talk) 22:00, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your kind words to me. But honestly since all Sand Trolls are Sandfury trolls and the other way around there is no real reason to split them (or other trolls). While Forsaken were a faction of various races, this is just a one race tribe and the only tribe of that race, if you can wrap your head around all this then im impressed. [[Image:inv_helmet_44.png|22px]]  (talk contribs) 19:49, 5 April 2012 (UTC)