User talk:Darkrabbit112921

Split quest pages
Why create more work? We have boilerplate pages for a reason, for consistency between articles. Teldrassil is the layout we try and go by. 17:22, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

18:49, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Yep I understand that but it easier to see all your quest (related to your faction in 1 click then look at the other factions stuff also.) Plus it makes printing easier.


 * I suppose it would be easier for printing. Other than that I see no advantage to splitting them up - the Blade's Edge quests haven't been updated but if you take a look at Teldrassil quests you can easily click to your specific faction from the table of contents at the top, in addition to jumping to the neutral quests if desired. I personally prefer the Teldrassil organization, but then again I'm a bit biased... In any case, if you do separate them please link them and name them in the same format as the other zones - we want things to look consistent.- 20:26, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

I do like the format from the Teldrassil site but the only problem that I see is you dont know at a glance with quest are chain and which are not. (not a very hard problem to fix). LOL. Think Teldrassil is a poor example of a alliance/horde/neutral page to Reference.Darkrabbit1


 * Lol, good point. Check out Thousand Needles quests instead. We have just been using Teldrassil as the example since it was formatted first and was the zone we were using to test things out on. And you are correct, we should have a way to reference whether the quest is in a chain. I like that the quest is listed in level order, however. I have been thinking about this for a while, we may be able to add a symbol denoting that the quest is part of a chain, which also is a link that takes the reader to that quest's chain listing further down the page. That way the quests would remain in order by level but also show that they are in a chain. -- 03:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)