Category talk:Doomguard

The plural of doomguard is "doomguard" not "doomguards" if I rememeber. Rolandius ( talk  -  contr ) 06:44, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Indeed! --Mordecay (talk) 21:56, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Move
Old (WotA trilogy) and new (Chronicle 1) literature have "Doomguard" for plural. Anyone oppose the move? --Mordecay (talk) 23:32, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm for the move. Well, I'm not so sure because they are both pretty much used. 23:44, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
 * @Mordecay, could you please provide a page number for WotA and Chronicle 1 regarding "Doomguard" being used as a plural. 03:14, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * So there's source material that has "doomguard" as plural. Is there source having "doomguards" as plural? Do both show up? Which is more prevalent? PeterWind (talk) 10:21, 30 November 2018 (UTC)


 * "Doomguards" is used in Demonic Servitude and RPG books like Manual of Monsters. In the canon books I mentioned, only "Doomguard" for plural is used, The Well of Eternity chapter 19, The Sundering chapter 5, and Chronicle's kindle position 911, 1783 & 2044. Same with Illidan, chapter 1: "Flanking him were two gigantic, batwinged doomguard, each almost as tall as their master, and a force of lesser demons." Basically there are no results of "doomguards" in those three works.
 * Same case is with the centaur, their plural is mostly centaur, sometimes centaurs but the category is without s.
 * I just noticed that this is the case of other types of demons as well, I'll check sources for them later. --Mordecay (talk) 11:53, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * While I personally prefer "doomguards" I'll say that this is good enough for me. I'm fine with a move. PeterWind (talk) 12:36, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah the plural is "doomguard". Similar to "felguard". -- MyMindWontQuiet 13:31, 30 November 2018 (UTC)