User talk:Wil55863158

Made-up information
Please don't make up information when expanding info on articles. We stick to what Blizzard tells us. 15:07, 29 September 2007 (UTC)


 * There's a point when I'm going to get annoyed with your edits, and it's coming rather too quickly. I suggest taking some time to see how the wiki works, and to read talk pages, before you make such changes, as there is often relevant info. The draenei are just "draenei", the Horde is just "the Horde", Icemist is the name of a village, not necessarily a tribe, and we don't know that much about the taunka. 15:18, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Please acknowledge that you have read the above. 15:31, 29 September 2007 (UTC)


 * We're trying to help you help us, such childish actions like deleting our advice to you don't help. 15:36, 29 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I concur. Adding made-up information or altering cited source material is frowned upon, and against policy. Removing discussions on your talk page, without acknowledging that you read it, is also frowned upon and considered rude.Baggins 15:37, 29 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok, this is slowly moving up to warning zone, if you don't leave an answer to these messages, and continue with the rude behavior, as well as continue add poor edits to articles (borderline vandalism). We may have to take action.Baggins 15:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

I don't know how to reply. It is not vandalism. On the Taunka page I didn somer Minor reformatting as the images made it harder to read, and added the character template. I added N/A and Unkown where the facts were not yet known. It is also know that they are friendly to the Horde if you read the Borean Tundra Page on the Blizzard Website. On the Dark horde Page I simply added in a template of the Component Orcish forces in the Dark Horde. Wil558 16;47, 29 September 2007 (GMT)


 * The Dark Horde edit was fair, though slightly misguided. The Manual of Style should help explain why there (see the navigation boxes section - the race links template is a 'special' template and doesn't follow them). As for taunka, you added a lot of speculatory information, which we do not add to infoboxes. Wooly Kodo? Height? Character classes? All of which you made up. Thank you for responding to our messages. 15:49, 29 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you for figuring out how to reply.Baggins 15:52, 29 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I still think the Taunka reformatting edit was justified as the page is almost impssible to read. Also if there's no information to fill the Race box with, It would be a very good idea to put Unkown or N/A as otherwise it looks rediculous and unfinished. Wil558 16:54, 29 September 2007 (GMT)


 * Ok, I'll agree there was issues with the way the page was formatted. However, there are better ways to format the page than you chose.Baggins 15:59, 29 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Done and done! Taunka should appear more reasonable now. :) 16:00, 29 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Thankyou very much, sorry for my rather Botched editts, I just thought that it was a page that will likely recieve a large amount of traffic as more WOTLK information is released, and it gave wowwiki a bad image, I just hope I didn't make it worse. (Wil558 16:01, 29 September 2007 (UTC))