Template talk:Classic only

Would a section version be wanted or nah? --Mordecay (talk) 15:36, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Sure, why not. Any other opinion? Xporc (talk) 15:40, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Might be fine yeah. PeterWind (talk) 17:05, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and moved it to Template:Classic only-section. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 19:36, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Optional Replacement Parameter
I propose adding replacement=_____ as an optional parameter, to look like this:

  The subject of this article was replaced in World of Warcraft but is present in World of Warcraft: Classic.

For an example of use, consider that will be dropped in 8.3.0 but remains part of 1.13.3. I should rightly be adding classic-only at the top of the article, but it would be helfpul to let people know about the new interface. DDC (talk) 16:17, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Seems reasonable. Though, there is still some naming to choose to differentiate Classic and BfA. For an example, your example template above and the template itself references BfA as "main" whereas items like Reins of the Bengal Tiger references BfA as Retail. Which one should it be: "Main" or "Retail"? 16:43, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I prefer "Retail". I can show many examples from Wowpedia or the official wow forums that it is in wide usage; though to be honest I've never seen a blue post making official this popular term. DDC (talk) 17:08, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * "Retail" does seem like the one to go. Also, thanks for updating the documentation! 17:25, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Category Text
While we are at it, is it possible to make the second line (about categories) appear only to logged-in users? I think it is unapproachable for non-editors who are presumably less likely to be logged in. DDC (talk) 17:39, 4 January 2020 (UTC)