Forum:If the RPG is not canon...

If the RPG isn't canon, why is information from the RPG featured so prominently in so many places on the 'pedia? I know it would be a massive undertaking, but shouldn't that information be removed, or perhaps moved somewhere specific to the RPG? I'm sure fans of the RPG would prefer to have all the RPG-centric information in one place, while the rest of us would probably prefer not to deal with truly non-canonical sources at all. Lostdrewid (talk) 01:08, 18 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Per the discussion at Forum:The RPG dilemma following the Ask CDev revelation, the policy is to segregate and clearly demarcate information from the Warcraft RPG, not outright remove it.-- 01:43, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh dear. From reading that discussion, I honestly think the wrong decision was made.  RPG information is even more of a mess than I thought it was.  It just irked me to continue seeing it on pages after I read about it being non-canon, but from the discussion you linked it's not just everywhere, but handled inconsistently to boot. /sigh Lostdrewid (talk) 02:09, 18 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Theoretically, there should be little-to-no inconsistency. Different pages were just modified with different levels of quality (or not at all).-- 02:41, 18 August 2013 (UTC)