Forum:Wikipedia links

When linking to wikipedia, I have seen several ways of doing this: Warcraft, and. I've mostly been using wplink myself, but just recently came across wp, which is even shorter textwise. Is there any difference in functionality? Is one way objectively a "better" choice than others? PeterWind (talk) 11:54, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Not really. is just a redirect to , which in turn is just a template that calls the  function. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 11:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Ahh I see. In the past I have changed some templates, from the longer wikipedia link to the shorter wplink, as I thougt it was easier on the eyes, but I wasn't sure if it was actually more effective. I assume the difference is negligible, but if the two shorter both link back to the longer wikipedia link, I think I'll use that from now on. PeterWind (talk) 12:29, 9 January 2017 (UTC)