no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
::Classic pages should record gameplay related stuff like quests, ressource nodes, etc. Also describe the lore at the time of WoW Classic, like saying the Loch is still intact in Loch Modan, etc. RPG and Warcraft III map information are not necessary on classic pages [[User:Xporc|Xporc]] ([[User talk:Xporc|talk]]) 10:50, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
:::It's been a while, but I made [https://wow.gamepedia.com/User:Aeliren85/Sandbox two] [https://wow.gamepedia.com/User:Aeliren85/Sandbox1 prototypes] in sandboxes concerning how I conceptualized the idea. I think the way things should be recorded on those pages should reflect how the zone/area was pre-Cata. Obviously, NPC, resource and quest info is a given. A bit of relevant lore, though I'm unsure if retroactive info should be recorded or only what was relevant at the time of Classic (for example in Pyrewood and Ambermill's cases, their Gilnean ties). Warcraft III map information is unnecessary and can be restricted to the retail page, but concerning RPG information, although non-canon, most are obviously meant to be relevant to their pre-Cata states. For example, on the Pyrewood and Ambermill pages, the RPG info is irrelevant to and even contradicts their Forsaken-conquered states but is relevant to the Classic-era Alliance-aligned states. This is only a prototype to visualize it, I'm sure it could be worked on further. [[User:Aeliren85|Aeliren85]] ([[User talk:Aeliren85|talk]]) 03:26, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
::::Your use of tabs in the Moonrage/Pyrewood worgen pages is interesting, but personally I'm not a fan of using tabs for stuff like Pyrewood Village or Archmage Ataeric. [[User:Xporc|Xporc]] ([[User talk:Xporc|talk]]) 11:02, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
|