(→Votes) |
Lon-ami@legacy41554525 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
So we're having a discussion here: [[Template talk:Humans#Fallen]] & [[Template talk:Orcs#Destroyed?]] about how to set up race factions templates. |
So we're having a discussion here: [[Template talk:Humans#Fallen]] & [[Template talk:Orcs#Destroyed?]] about how to set up race factions templates. |
||
− | First of all, what are "race factions templates"? they're navigation templates that list all the organizations of |
+ | First of all, what are "race factions templates"? they're navigation templates that list all the organizations of members of the same race. Naga tribes, worgen packs, vrykul clans, magnataur herds... Though sometimes they are located on "Template:RACE+S" mainspace, they're not to be confused with race navigation templates. |
Most of these templates don't have any section dividing the listed organizations, but others do, and that's where we're seeing different versions. Until now, most of them were organized by parent factions (orc clans were under each different Horde, for example). I think it's the best model, but there's others, like active/defunct. The objective of this vote is to see if we stick with the old model or we get to make a new one and apply it to each of these templates. |
Most of these templates don't have any section dividing the listed organizations, but others do, and that's where we're seeing different versions. Until now, most of them were organized by parent factions (orc clans were under each different Horde, for example). I think it's the best model, but there's others, like active/defunct. The objective of this vote is to see if we stick with the old model or we get to make a new one and apply it to each of these templates. |
Revision as of 20:50, 25 March 2012
So we're having a discussion here: Template talk:Humans#Fallen & Template talk:Orcs#Destroyed? about how to set up race factions templates.
First of all, what are "race factions templates"? they're navigation templates that list all the organizations of members of the same race. Naga tribes, worgen packs, vrykul clans, magnataur herds... Though sometimes they are located on "Template:RACE+S" mainspace, they're not to be confused with race navigation templates.
Most of these templates don't have any section dividing the listed organizations, but others do, and that's where we're seeing different versions. Until now, most of them were organized by parent factions (orc clans were under each different Horde, for example). I think it's the best model, but there's others, like active/defunct. The objective of this vote is to see if we stick with the old model or we get to make a new one and apply it to each of these templates.
To make things easier, I'm categorizing all of these templates under Category:Faction navigation templates.
Example for the old models: Humans & Orcs.
Vote: Keep the old model, or make a new one?
A vote is in progress!
|
|
|
Votes
- Old Model
- Yes Lon-ami (talk) 23:05, 24 March 2012 (UTC) - (I think the old ones are the best and most clear way to organize them.)
- Yes g0urra[T҂C] 18:59, 25 March 2012 (UTC) - (no comment)
- New Model
Comments
If active/defunct is deemed important, we could always represent it with a "†" next to each faction.--Lon-ami (talk) 23:05, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- Why does this even exist. People just love to make pointless votes. The Artist Formerly Known As, MoneygruberTheGoblin (talk contribs) 23:16, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think it's pointless, unless you mean we should revert it seeing the majority on the talk page preferred the old model, without making any vote. I'm just making sure we settle this, covering all the templates at once, so the styles of the templates stop changing back and forth.--Lon-ami (talk) 23:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- Sounds more like you want it your way instead of just having them in a way that's not controversial. Looking at any other templates they don't have this type of template. It's just listing the organizations which is what it should be. The Artist Formerly Known As, MoneygruberTheGoblin (talk contribs) 23:26, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- Dude, you're acting like a troll. Some major changes need to be discussed, specially if affects to popular templates like orcs and humans ones. Get over it.
- Returning to the main issue, I note differences between both templates. I like how looks the human template but I have some doubts about the orcs' main fields. I mean, some orc clans are contained in variuos rows like Bleeding Hollow, Dragonmaw or Frostwolf. I bet there is a better way to manage the information. --Petrovic (talk) 00:07, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- A clan is a clan. The Artist Formerly Known As, MoneygruberTheGoblin (talk contribs) 03:32, 25 March 2012 (UTC)