Name[]
Since this is gonna be Shadowlands' new resource, shouldn't we consider the current anima page as secondary and move this one to the non-disambiguated name? Xporc (talk) 12:05, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- I'd agree. PeterWind (talk) 16:08, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- :point_up: --Ryon21 (talk) 17:06, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Definitely. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 17:13, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Aye. --Mordecay (talk) 19:10, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah. There's still a chance they may turn out to be the same thing (somehow), in which case we can just merge the pages. -- — MyMindWontQuiet 20:08, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Aye. --Mordecay (talk) 19:10, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Definitely. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 17:13, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Source Missing?[]
"Mists of Pandaria featured another substance also known as "anima", though the two are not to be confused. Mists of Pandaria anima is condensed life energy, whereas Shadowlands anima is death energy."
Can we source this? What is the source? Aphet (talk) 22:46, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- No source, this is just something we assumed Xporc (talk) 22:23, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Fwiw, this interview says that "There are definitely ties between the anima of the Shadowlands and the anima of Pandaria." --
Mordecay (talk) 22:41, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, figure we'll know more soon enough! PeterWind (talk) 22:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- It's no longer such a definitive statement. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 07:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, figure we'll know more soon enough! PeterWind (talk) 22:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Fwiw, this interview says that "There are definitely ties between the anima of the Shadowlands and the anima of Pandaria." --