Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dragonsworn article.

Source book[]

Is there any actual information on this class at all that can be put here besides the picture?Tweak the Whacked (talk) 07:24, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Added some, there's about 3 whole pages on them in the source book, but that's all I feel like adding for now. User:CoobraSssssssssssssssssssssssss User:CoobraFor Pony! {TDon't hiss at me.CIf you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.) 07:43, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
If it is a quote from a source, shouldn't there be quote marks around the sentences? This way I don't grammar check it, then get blamed for touching a quote.  Rolandius Wc3Knight (talk - contr) 09:56, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Possible dragonsworn[]

In terms of what we can put in the article, theres nothing further. But between us on the talk page: possibly dragonsworn, most likely nothing more than a simple tool. Dragonsworn are supposed to be rare and most beings who serve dragons never attain the status of dragonsworn. Doubt he's a dragon himself. Game mechanics (Humanoid/Dragonkin) mean squat in terms of identifying creatures but I doubt they would have gone out of their way to label Kalaran as dragonkin and not Maltrake if he was one too. But again, it means squat. Devs are sometimes inconsistant (though they've gotten better lately) when it comes to those type of labels on npcs.Warthok Talk Contribs 20:55, October 25, 2009 (UTC)