Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia

Saying Harvest golem is a Harvest golem doesn't make sense.  Rolandius  (talk - contr) 11:54, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure it does... It's like saying Dark Ranger is a Dark ranger, or that Deathknight is a Death knight, or that Blue Dragonspawn is a blue Dragonspawn. Just cause that's their name doesn't mean that's not their race/class. User:CoobraSssssssssssssssssssssssss User:CoobraFor Pony! {TDon't hiss at me.CIf you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.) 12:19, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
I mean in the first sentence. Wouldn't writing "A Harvest Golem is a mechanical golem" or something look nicer than saying "A Harvest Golem is a level 10-12 Harvest golem"? Unless it was unique and that was one golem's name only, then I could see it. Also, if you go to those pages you linked they don't say a Dark Ranger is a Dark ranger or that a Deathknight is a Death knight. They say a Dark Ranger is a Forsaken Humanoid and a Death Knight is a Human Undead.  Rolandius  (talk - contr) 13:53, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Of course they don't, the introduction is usually this (mob) is a (race) (type) found in (location). But one can't assume you were talking about the introduction when all you state is "Saying Harvest golem is a Harvest golem doesn't make sense." User:CoobraSssssssssssssssssssssssss User:CoobraFor Pony! {TDon't hiss at me.CIf you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.) 13:58, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
LOL Ya, I thought he was going to be the first person to read what I said, and so knew what I would be talking about.  Rolandius  (talk - contr) 14:02, 20 July 2008 (UTC)