Talk: Landro Longshot

What's happened to his feet (As NPC)? I mean, eww O_o --Tinkerer 12:30, 3 December 2006 (EST)

Nothing about "The Black Flame" yet? Seems to be the black market group that landros involved in. Hmmm.... might need to add that. --Karye

New Loot Cards

There's 3 more new loot cards that need pages. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hikariu (talk · contr).

Name

Named for Lando Calrissian, of course. Xavius, the Satyr Lord 20:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Updated model

I forgot when they updated the model I think either 4.3.0a or 4.6.0. So if anyone may what to check on this. The Alchemic Warrior of Travels (talk) 21:16, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Patch added

Landro's Wowhead page says he was added in 2.2.0, but there are comments on Wowhead before that patch: 1.12.2 and 2.0.12, which indicate that he was added before 2.2.0? Though he does have an npcID that matches the Burning Crusade expansion. Junkerd (talk) 00:18, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

IIRC, 2.2.0 is a bug on wowhead's part. Not sure tho, given the ID range. EDIT: some of the items were added in 2.0.1. that may be an indicator as well. --Mordecay (talk) 00:22, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

 [Riding Turtle]'s article was created on the 24th of November 2006, making it seem like he was possibly added in 1.12.2, a better way to find out, would be to find out when the TCG card for the Saltwater Snapjaw was released. Junkerd (talk) 01:57, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

In my experience, anything that says 2.2.0 on Wowhead that wasn't actually added in 2.2.0 was added in 2.0.3. Comments from earlier could have come from when it was in beta. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 08:48, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Seems that the Heroes of Azeroth TCG booster packs, were released on the 24th of October 2006, but I do agree that Landro and some of his items were added to the game in 2.0.3, as they all have IDs that match other TBC IDs and as you said, Wowhead saying it's 2.2.0 isn't all that reliable, especially since there seems to be a lot of Wowhead comments from 2.0.12 and the 1 comment from 1.12.2 is most likely from beta. Junkerd (talk) 12:50, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

It is my understanding, that it is as DarkTZeratul says. Of course this can make it troublesome to differentiate between things that were actually added in 2.2.0. Looking at ID range, can give an indication, but again', it's not solid proof either. PeterWind (talk) 15:30, 3 February 2018 (UTC)