Can the controversy over her questionable tweets be added? {{Kellmg96 (talk) 23:27, 24 July 2021 (UTC)|Kellmg96}}
- You're going to have to be much more specific, and keep in mind that she's only a contracted author; unless there's some direct connection to Blizzard I'm hard-pressed to see how it's relevant. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 05:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Its a pattern of history from a severely horrible and toxic company. Its relevant. https://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/2572207-WoW-Novel-writer-Madeleine-Roux-has-a-pretty-interesting-Twitter-history {{Kellmg96 (talk) 23:27, 24 July 2021 (UTC)|Kellmg96}}
- Yeah, I really don't see how any of that is relevant. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 23:13, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
-Her very public views and opinions on certain races and sexes arent relevant. And its relevancy towards the Blizz lawsuit im talking about, its general relevances to herself. History matters, as do very public statements. {{Kellmg96 (talk) 23:27, 24 July 2021 (UTC)|Kellmg96}}
- She doesn't work at Blizzard. She is not a Blizzard employee. She was contracted to do a piece of work for Blizzard, and the things she says have nothing to do with either the issues at Blizzard or Blizzard games. Whether or not it was a shitty thing to say, there is no relevance. Also, please sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 23:21, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
-So if its not relevant to her, and not the current situation like i said, then why does she even have a page? Its either all of her or none. Kellmg96 (talk) 23:27, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- She herself is relevant because she wrote a couple books for Blizzard. Not everything about her life is relevant to Warcraft, however, and this site is not a gossip column dishing dirt on people. What is relevant is, in fact, very much somewhere between all and none. You'll notice, for instance, that despite a long career as an author we aren't talking about anything she wrote that wasn't for Blizzard. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 23:32, 24 July 2021 (UTC)