Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
Advertisement
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Homeworlds

Right, exactly why are we considering Mini Diablo and the Zergling a part of the Warcraft universe to the extent that they're listed on this page? And if the Silithid haven't been confirmed as not native to Azeroth, should they even be here? --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 14:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Well Mini Diablo and the Zergling are in the game that is all. The Silithid idea I got from the Silithid page, it had a citation and everything. It said one theory was a different planet and another theory had to do something with the Well of Eternity.  Rolandius Wc3Knight (talk - contr) 02:53, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
That's fine, I've added a disclaimer for the Silithid and Gourra removed the in-jokes. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 02:58, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Oh you mean the two pets? Oh okay.  Rolandius Wc3Knight (talk - contr) 03:12, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
I'd ignore anything derived from an April Fool's joke as being valid lore. If it got incorporated later on into lore (similar to the pandaren), then only the updated information would count.Baggins (talk) 03:21, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
I thought they are two pets you can have in the actual game, and not an April Fool's joke thing?  Rolandius Wc3Knight (talk - contr) 03:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
The zerg homeworld is an april fool's joke. ...or rather it orignates from tauren marine joke.Baggins (talk) 03:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Oh I know about that map thing from April Foosl. But those two pets came out a long time ago didn't they? So I thought they had a homeworld too, not necessarily the one in the April Fools map.  Rolandius Wc3Knight (talk - contr) 03:29, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Have you bothered to read the quests for all three pets? The quest text isn't even in-universe lore, it breaks the fourth wall by using the term World of Warcraft and referring to the player playing the game.Baggins (talk) 03:31, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
I know that, but these pets are summonable and people can see them running around in-universe. There are examples of a lot of funny things in the game, like level 67 marmots.  Rolandius Wc3Knight (talk - contr) 03:35, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Its a vanity pet, its to be cool, a gift for having the Collector's Edition. That's all they are, that's all the quests state they are. Don't ignore the quest text explanations.Baggins (talk) 03:36, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Okay but isn't that similiar to the Flowerpicker Clan and the Bunny pages?  Rolandius Wc3Knight (talk - contr) 03:45, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

The flowerpicker clan never states it is a real clan. It states that it is something found in the files. People speculate that it was intended to be a real clan. But that's purely speculation.

The marmot has a storyline, see H [20-30] The Smallest Creatures for the story. The bunny map has its own storyline as well, told through an introduction cutscene, ending cutscene, and background text on the legendary items that can be bought on the island.

What makes the collector's edition vanity quests different is that they are specifically stated to just be gifts for joining the World of Warcraft, there is no storyline behind them, they are only intended to be fun gifts.Baggins (talk) 03:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Okay I see.  Rolandius Wc3Knight (talk - contr) 04:27, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Wow Baggins you just erased a huge section of the page.  Rolandius Wc3Knight (talk - contr) 02:27, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

And with good reason, if you check the edit history. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 03:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Ya he is making one page into five pages I guess.  Rolandius Wc3Knight (talk - contr) 03:24, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Not making five articles at all. Moon was already an article, and we have other articles like higher plane already.
Okay well however you want it. Just the page "worlds" changed into "planets", then "dimensions", then "planes", then "extra-dimensional", and then I dunno what is next. Planetoids and Plutoids?  Rolandius Wc3Knight (talk - contr) 03:36, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

The Homeworld of Naaru and Moon Dogs

What refers that the naaru and the moon dogs has same home planet? At least the article makes me think that it claims that they have the same home world.

--Nuti (talk) 08:03, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

The Planet versus the World in the Way of the Speaking of WoW Creatures

I've always thought that when humanoids etc. from different planets speaks about the home planets, they don't use very often word "a home planet" but "a home world". The word "world" calls more like fantasy-styled and more suitable for the cratures of WoW... whaddya think?

--Nuti (talk) 08:03, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Tried it once, didn't really work. Planet is also used often. Besides, we already use "homeworld" instead of home planet.__Ragestorm (talk · contr) 13:35, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Should i add planet that Nerzhul promised to Death knights and where some of them escaped to Unknown worlds? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Noobi666 (talk · contr).

No, I don't think so. Let's only add conjectural planets we know exist. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 16:00, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Homeworlds. Again.

I don't think voidwalkers and annihilan should be up there as they come from the Twisting Nether, which isn't a planet. And should the silithid really be up there too? Tarimar Plainstotem (talk) 21:06, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

With the revelation that the Eredar came form a planet, Argus, any demon could have originated on one. The viodwalkers, however, do come from the Twisting Nether. Harbinger Skyriss' words can be interpreted as the insectoid servants of the Old Gods coming from somewhere else.--SWM2448 21:41, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
Advertisement