Template talk:Pearls

From Wowpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Cataclysm Pearls

Why not? [Darkfathom Pearl] and [Flawless Pearl] are found inside clams just like any other pearl. ~ Tycerius (talk) 23:57, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Those pearls aren't used for anything else but vendoring. This template should be used for pearls that are used for crafting or has any use at all. --g0urra[T҂C] 23:58, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Being a gray vendor item doesn't mean it still can't be listed in the template. Other templates list gray items (e.g., {{Arrows}} and {{Bullets}} ).
Those are for historical references. Arrows and bullets don't exist anymore. --g0urra[T҂C] 00:09, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
And these pearls do exist. Hence why they should be listed in the template for reference. ~ Tycerius (talk) 00:13, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
And what purpose would it serve? The grey pearls have no use, unlike the ones that are used for crafting. --g0urra[T҂C] 00:16, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
I agree with g0urra, this template is for pearls that are used for professions. Otherwise it would open up the doorways for things like  [Mysterious Pearl] and  [Luminescent Pearl]. Snake.gifSssssssssssssssssssssssss Coobra sig3.gifFor Pony! (Sssss/Slithered) 00:17, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Of course not. I'm not asking for every single type of pearl to be listed (although that could be done by simply adding a section for Quest-item pearls. But given what few pearls do exist in-game, those pearls which can be found inside clams should be noteworthy enough to be included in this template, regardless of quality or supposed "use". ~ Tycerius (talk) 00:33, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
It seems to me that the entire point of this template is to show "crafting" pearls. It makes no sense to extend it beyond that. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 21:34, 23 November 2011 (UTC)