User talk:Tweak the Whacked

From Wowpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Again, welcome!--SWM2448 21:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Lore Comments

Great job on all the hard-hitting lore article comments! Some of them were a bit extreme for my tastes, but large errors need to be pointed out.--SWM2448 02:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Alpha leaks

...are not allowed on the wowwiki and as such all discussion about them will get removed. Goes for Mograine too.--g0urra[T҂C] 00:25, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Alright. Didn't put the information up, but it did make me curious, which lead to my comment on the talk page. I'll keep this in mind in the future.Tweak the Whacked (talk) 00:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Citation, Citation, Citation!

What's the source for the epitaphs (yeah, not really the right word, but it's the closest I could get) you've been adding? I'm not convinced that they're the best direction... --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 13:35, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

All from the respective shadows and light pages. I'll go through and add the cites to them, just didn't think it looked as good on the pages with them.Tweak the Whacked (talk) 15:23, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Better cited than uncited. I'm still not convinced that we need them, but that's another discussion. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 16:05, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Eh, they are ok but they shouldn't be at the beginning of the article. They should be in an "appearance" section after all the background lore info stuff. They should also be paraphrased into a more encyclopedic style (that fits the rest of the sections of the article). Get rid of the second-person narrative perspective. Much like what was originally done on Elune.Baggins (talk) 08:41, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Pick a name like "Physical Description" or something. Kirkburn, Pcj and I are working on a new Appearances section that will list all the sources (minus the RPG) a character has appeared in, so we need that name. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 13:59, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

aquatic form

Um, as I don't have a druid of the appropriate level to find out directly, could you expand on your comment about the aquatic form quest? --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 17:13, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Well I was leveling my tauren druid and I got aquatic form from the trainer at 16 before picking up the quest. The aquatic form page itself notes the quest is no longer required for the form, so the quest page should be updated to reflect that.Tweak the Whacked (talk) 13:05, 2 August 2009 (UTC)