Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Sandwichman2448 (Talk) 18:46, February 12, 2010

Spell power coefficients

Hey Veljamh!

In the spell power coefficients article, you changed the effects of [Arcane Empowerment] on [Arcane Missiles] and [Arcane Barrage]. I was about to revert this change, because both changes contradict AE's tooltip. However, since you made many sensible adjustments to the article, I assume you had reason to do so. Did you actually obtains these values by testing? I guess if your values are correct, a footnote would be appropriate to indicate that the talent does not function as advertised.

In addition, I noticed you made quite a few changes to coefficients without modifying the "last patch tested" entries. For example, Cone of Cold's entry suggests that its coefficient was tested in Patch 3.0.8, which is wrong now (unless you actually did this, which would be odd considering when have 3.3.2 already). If you forgot about those entries, please update them so that the information is correct once again.

Kind regards, Bfx (talk) 12:09, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah that was an oversight... In actually changing the patch versions tested, since I use 3.3.2 now :)

And I was annoyed all the time by a bit outdated coefs there, so I wanted to help out. In the future, I will place the actual patch tested so people can be sure that tested coefficients are current with the patch.

Thanks for notifying me :)


Veljamh (talk) 18:52, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Perfect – and btw, thanks for the work here! I'm impressed by the amount of values you have provided already. As you said, the article is in dire need of more up-to-date values, so any help is appreciated.
FYI: I've moved your comment to your talk page so we can follow the discussion more easily. Bfx (talk) 21:04, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Flame Shock coefficient 3.3.0

I just wanna know why you think the coefficient would have changed with 3.3.0. I'm playing an Elemental Shaman and I can guarantee you that 3.3.0 didn't introduce any changes in terms of FS-coefficients, so both the DoT and the DD-coefficient are wrong. Tested it myself, with your coefficient my FS(DD) should hit for less then 1.4k, which isn't correct, seeing as it hits for nearly 2k all the time. (non-crit, of course) So please revert those changes, because they're just not correct. DaDimi (talk) 10:25, February 21, 2010 (UTC)